This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

Dasus ,

Also when "conspiracy theory" automatically reads as "bullshit" to everyone, actual conspiracies get looked at less.

And to remind everyone "conspiracy" is just a plan by two or more people to commit a crime. A much more mundane term than what it's current connotations would suggest.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird

Dasus ,

I'll let anyone buy a Finnish residency. Just pay me a to-be-agreed-upon sum and then we'll get married and it should be quite a done deal. Perhaps need to keep addresses the same on paper for a few years but that's it.

Hit me with them offers.

Dasus ,

Unless you're a spy who ran from Russia (and basically not even then, as we have supo), why would that matter?

Unlike the US, Finland has and continues to successfully avoid Russia meddling in it's affairs.

We got labour protection, social security and have among other things, fixed homelessness.

Yes, there's a lot of issues as well, but compared to other countries, I'd say the average person is fairly well off in Finland in terms of financial security. Mental health is a whole other matter, though.

Dasus ,

Even before that, we had formidable defence force.

Just us alone, with EU's largest artillery, but on top of that, NORDEFCO and the defence clause of the EU.

But NATO is a bonus yeah.

Dasus ,

Only to be CEO of a massive capitalist company.

I've heard a few tales of some CEO's (of very small companies) here in the Nordics actually being generous to their employees. Like it's most definitely a rarity, but I believe it is possible.

Like a CEO who values profits but values employees and paying their fair share more and isn't blinded by greed and addicted to money. A socialist, literally. A market socialist, but a socialist nonetheless.

Everyone could have their basic needs met, and we could still have rich people. Just not filthy rich, not "rich-to-the-point-no-one-else-has-anything" rich.

Dasus ,

Bring back the gestapo already.

You forgot the "/s". Please, it's important in these times.

Dasus ,

Well Finland, really, in this case.

Joining NATO really didn't change the situation in practice at all.

We've had a pretty stable if salty relationship with Russia, since, well... quite a few hundred years since.

The NATO thing has been on the table for 70+ years. I don't mind it went through, the idea of NATO is great (US just has somewhat too much influence over it for it to be truly a politically neutral defence alliance), but even when it went through, it was about 50/50.

The people who were pro-NATO used a lot of fear mongering about Russia. Even when it was rather clear Russia would not have had the resources and troops to open up a second front.

Dasus , (edited )

In the last few months, yeah, it was more popular than 50/50, that's why it went through. But even during the first several months of the current Russo--Ukrainian wars, most polls showed it to be pretty even. Until it wasn't.

Joining NATO was a good thing. I just do have certain reservations about it, and we definitely didn't need it against Russia.

You'll notice that September 2022 is several months later than the start of the current Russo-Ukrainian war.

The people who were pro-NATO used a lot of fear mongering
or maybe you are naive

Or maybe I'm an NCO in the Finnish reserves and have a better understanding of Finnish military capabilities than you? I've sat lessons in which most scenarios of Russia attacking were discussed.

And even without NATO, we weren't alone. We're part of NORDEFCO and EU.

So yeah, I'm not naive, but you're definitely I'll-informed. Like a lot of people were, which is why the fear mongering worked so well.

Finland used to be under Russia too, so Finland is very likely on the list.

If you're talking pre Finnish independence, technically, yes, but also, no. We were an autonomous region, the Grand Duchy of Finland.

And yes, of course we're "on the list", but unless Russia attacks straight up with nukes, it's really not a potential threat currently. And hasn't been since Russia's "special military operation".

We had good plans, resources and alliances to deal with a Russian who hadn't put all their resources towards Ukraine, and we could've easily done it without NATO, but after Russia is even weaker and has no resources to send against us, we somehow suddenly require NATO?

Ridiculous. Do you know that the EU also has a mutual defence clause?

That's why we need to quickly push through the Accession of Ukraine into the European Union.

Again, I'm not anti-NATO, and don't mind that we joined NATO, at all. It was probably due at some point, and what better point than when Russia is weak and can't even manage their usual threats. My problem is that the rhetoric that was used to gather support for the notion was entirely fearmongering.

Edit adding this direct quote from the article you linked

"Backing for membership in Yle polls has grown from 53 percent in February to 62 percent in March and 76 percent in May. Before the Russian attack on Ukraine, a majority of Finns had long opposed membership."

Dasus ,

I do not think you understand the strategic danger Finland would be in without NATO

Well I've sat actual lessons on it in the army, from people who's literal job is defending this country.

Where are you getting your info from?

The point is that a majority of Finns saw no need of NATO even when we had shittier equipment for our military and no military alliances. Now we're in NORDEFCO and the EU. We've the advantage when defending, especially with our utilisation of our geography and the biggest and most accurate artillery in Europe.

With an arsenal of 700 howitzers, 700 heavy mortars and 100 multiple rocket launchers, Finland has the largest artillery capability in western Europe. Homeland defence willingness against a superior enemy is at 83%, one of the highest rates in Europe.

Nordefco is definitely not a defense pact

What on Earth are you smoking, my man? That's literally all it is.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordic_Defence_Cooperation

Just the combined power of the Nordic countries would be pretty significant against Russia. Swedes rule the Baltic Sea, we hold the border with Russia, and Norway holds the North, with tons of cooperation that's been practiced for decades (Official Finnish Defence Forces channel) .

And if Russia attacked an EU country, every member nation is required to assist?

The Treaty of Lisbon strengthens the solidarity between European Union (EU) Member States in dealing with external threats by introducing a mutual defence clause (Article 42(7) of the Treaty on European Union). This clause provides that if a Member State is the victim of armed aggression on its territory, the other Member States have an obligation to aid and assist it by all the means in their power, in accordance with Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations.

"... by all means in their power. "

That means military aid, troops, for those who can. France, Germany, UK, Poland, everyone.

This is why we can't send troops to Ukraine, because that could be seen as an aggressive move by the EU against Russia. But if Russia attacked Finland, or any other member of the EU, Russia would be practically declaring war with them all.

Ukraine is a big country, yes, but compared to the entire EU, it's something Russia dares to challenge.

It wouldn't dare to challenge the European fucking Union.

It's amazing you feel you need to mention you are not anti NATO, being anti NATO as an NCO in the Finnish reserves, would be insane now IMO.

How so? A majority of Finnish males are in the reserves, and I remind you that as we saw from the Yle article you linked, before 2022, most Finns were opposed to NATO.

We're not so authoritarian that we demand people can't have their own opinions.

~75% of Finnish males go through the service and thus are in the reserves up until they're 55-65 (NCO's and officers remain in the reserves 10 years longer.)

It's alway fun talking to some American who thinks their military equals NATO (one of the reasons NATO wasn't so popular here) and think they're some knight in shining armor saving a damsel in distress.

Sorry bruv, but American troops wouldn't manage shit in Finland.

A group of conscripts from a supply group (ie a group of cooks, basically, who get six months of training) defeated a USMC group in an exercise here in Finland.

https://www.iltalehti.fi/kotimaa/a/65e5530a-2149-41bd-b509-54760c892dfb

Oh fuck that's paywalled.

https://www.quora.com/Did-the-Finnish-military-just-beat-the-US-Marines-in-Cold-Response

That's better.

You should be more open to what you don't know instead of assuming you do.

Dasus , (edited )

It's not a binding agreement. It's based on voluntary cooperation, as is with quite clear letters in the name. But is is most definitely purely for defence cooperation. To challenge that would be silly.

Why'd you skip over 95% of the comment?

Where did you sit your lessons on Finnish military capability, especially in regards to a war with Russia?

Mine were in the Pori Brigade, and Häme Regiment for my special training.

And the EU article is a very clear defence pact.

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/glossary/mutual-defence-clause.html

Please, do respond to the other points. I'm interested.

Did you also skip the part where I was completely right about the support numbers? Probably because I actually live here, and you had to quickly just Google something?

Dasus ,

Please show me where I make just a hint about that, I have not written ANYTHING about the Finish defense capabilities.

Ok:

Finland could be overrun before a decision was made in EU to even do anything.

"Our lacking ability to supply Ukraine without USA". It's not about the lack of ability. It's about Ukraine not being in EU, so direct military aid, and especially troops is harder to send. Our militaries aren't designed to be overflowing with equipment we can just donate away, so it takes a bit of time to see what can be taken and from where. EU is now, afaik, making seized Russian assets available to Ukraine, and getting money to buy armament with is quite as important as getting armament. Even more so, because with money you can also buy non-armament supplies, which are also needed.

Finland has never trusted Russia. Sweden tried to, a bit, by generously demilitarising Gotland, up until it had to rearm it a few years back because after there was no military there, suddenly Russian tourists of military serving age started "touring" it. Now there's a permanent base again.

might have a chance to divide both Europe and NATO, and Finland could be such an area to poke.

What are you on about? Do you know how the Winter War and the Continuation War played out? How would Russia attacking Finland "divide" Europe, unless you're implying that Russia is a part of Europe, because we were more discussing in the context of the European Union, not Europe in general. European Union is very strong and there's articles that have been agreed to. International politics don't really work with the "no I'm not gonna, because I don't wonna" attitude.

You're severely underestimating Finland's defenses pre joining NATO. And that (usually American) cockiness is exactly why a lot of people still oppose NATO.

Dasus ,

Again, skipping 95% of the reply, but still you feel the need to answer.

That's rather weird.

How would Russia attacking Finland "divide Europe"?

Ukraine had no defense cooperation with any country, yet people still think Finland is in a similar situation, and like you, always willfully ignore NORDEFCO and the EU.

Dasus ,

Same.

It seems as childish as toddlers having broken something by throwing it forcefully on the floor and then pretending that they don't understand why the thing broke.

Dasus ,

Yeah, and back then, he had hair and hadn't abused anabolic steroids so was like 40% of the size he is today.

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/725aa879-1f35-49ff-a1d5-fae303bb0c73.jpeg

Dasus ,

Moomin soda is what I'm currently drinking. Forest strawberry flavoured.

But perhaps... Pommac?

Just plain carbonated water is my go to, but if I drink something sweet, usually those new caffeine free cokes. But best taste / sensation is Pommac or Moomin, definitely.

Dasus ,

No, it isn't, since the screenplay the book was based on existed before, and that's what George used for the movie; his own screenplay, not a book written based on his screenplay.

No right wing wave in Finland as Left Alliance take record result in EU elections ( yle.fi )

Finland's results in the European election bucked a continent-wide trend of rising support for parties on the outer fringe of right-wing politics, with the Left Alliance and the National Coalition winning big at the expense of the nationalist Finns Party....

Dasus ,

Well I don't think we really have, honestly.

It's just that the inbred racists who are all too common don't think these elections mattered.

Yeah. 42% turnout.

Dasus ,

Guys.

Finn here.

42 % turnout.

We still have a massive problem with rising nationalism and general right-wing rhetoric, don't kid yourselves. It's just that those morons don't think EU elections matter.

Dasus ,

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.

— Albert Einstein

Dasus ,

So a solar golf cart might be doable?

Dasus ,

It takes line 10s of adult research to find a whole range of possibilities.

Plus it's a fairly commonly researched topic amongst male teenagers... or so I've heard.

Dasus ,

I can not answer why, but I've been told I do it too.

And wake up holding my junk a lot of the time.

A lot of the times it's definitely to reposition balls.

So sometimes not because it's comfortable per se (and it is), but because doing it avoids possible discomfort, I guess.

Also, morning wood. What's that about? What's the benefit of getting an erection when we wake up? O.o

Dasus ,

Yeah this is an answer I've heard, but it's sort of generalised.

I'd like a every detailed medical explanation on why it happens specifically when waking up.

Dasus ,

Why is criticism never accepted?

Why is it "leave" instead of addressing the issues brought up?

Dasus ,

And I also support users moving to a place where they feel a better sense of community.

How about supporting users who want to improve their community instead of finding a new one?

If you don't like it, you can leave.

Dasus ,

If this wasn't possible we'd have to find an alternative to money/transaction based economic systems.

Capitalism doesn't have a monopoly on market economies. Although it sure as fuck pretends and tries to.

Dasus ,

Btw a USSR-style planned economy falls outside the term market economy, even thoughthey had money, right?

Uhm, yes. That's the polar opposite of market economy; a planned economy.

One of the definitions of socialism is "the means of production are owned or regulated by the state".

I know a lot of people vehemently disagree, but we Nordics are technically socialist countries. Social democracies which utilise market socialism, insofar that the markets are heavily regulated and products taxed, but taxes (and fines) are progressive, and the tax money gets spent on society. (Well, in the ideal case, obviously, we're faaaaar from fucking perfect.)

Capitalism is essentially just to market economies what cancer is to cell growth. It's not to wrong to call the former the latter, but the latter is a category. The former is usually also malignant.

Capitalism always strives for monopolies. That's why even the US has socialist policies. That's not to be taken as me saying they're socialist in any way, just the nature of the policies are. It's the state regulating the market to prevent monopolies from fucking it up. Antitrust laws.

So to answer your question of "what other options", have a peek at market socialism.

I think we have the resources to give everyone a shitton more if the crazy wealth hoarders stop. That's it. Get some control on the crazy addiction for money, we can still have market economies, private property, a faster developing economy, but also less crime, less inequality and less suffering overall.

Literally just take the ultra rich out of the picture. We will still have rich people and people can strive for wealth. Just as long as we meet people's basic needs, have good labour laws and manage to take care of the planet.

And because that will jump start even more space exploration since we could actually fund NASA instead of having Elon play with his dildockets, we could actually get somewhere, and once there's proper infra for some commerce up there, hey, go at it capitalists, the space is literally infinite. Just don't mess up our solar system.

Dasus ,

I thank you.

It's rare to get a good faith reply to my replies sometimes, huehue.

I'm too sleepy to respond in depth, perhaps tomorrow. Good night, fr3n.

TIL in the Carboniferous Period, no fungus existed to decompose trees. They just grew on top of each other up and up.

The weight of the trees was so great that the ones on the bottom got squished and became coal. That’s where coal is from. Bonus fact: the whole time this was happening, sharks were hunting in the oceans. Sharks are older than trees and fungus!

Dasus ,

Fungi in general are about twice as old as sharks. Roughly a billion years vs ~450 million years.

The point is there just weren't any which had bacteria to decompose trees, as no bacteria had evolved the ability yet. Until there were. Took millions of years though.

Fun fact, now we have mushrooms which can deal with plastic.

Pestalotiopsis microspora is a type of endophytic fungus discovered in the Amazon rainforest in 2011 which contains bacteria that can biodegrade and break down synthetic plastic polymers.

Dasus ,

Big? Rail gun to launch stuff into orbit.

Have you heard of SpinLaunch?

https://www.wired.com/story/hurling-satellites-into-space/

Dasus ,

"Trying it"

"Forces too high"

I'm unsure what you mean. You don't believe it works..?

https://www.space.com/spinlaunch-aces-10th-suborbital-test-launch

Dasus ,

Oh right, right.

But the technology is feasibly, now just have to optimise satellite builds, and I'm sure institutions like NASA are better at making "the bullet", and this company is rather just the gun-smiths, metaphorically.

But the technology is sound, and pretty impressive to boot.

Does the USA have any open market cellular options that are legitimate pay-as-you-go and only for what you use options like Europe yet?

I've lived under a rock for 10 years. I did Metro ages ago while most were still on contracts. Surely we've reached true capitalist open market freedom by now. Is it still total closed market, noncompetitive, privateering corruption?

Dasus ,

Finn here. For us, receiving SMS has never cost anything. Downloading MMS, that used to cost, but no-one uses those.

Sending an SMS could be as expensive as 20c when I was a kid. And an SMS is 160 characters. So if you wrote a long one it'd send it as three.

Then when I was about 12-13 there started being unlimited texting packages, which advertised as unlimited but after giving kids access to the service for a few months, limits were soon imposed to like a 1000 sms a month.

Scientists Pinpoint Main Cause of Sensory Hypersensitivity in Autism ( scitechdaily.com )

This study has identified the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) as a key area in the brain responsible for sensory hypersensitivity in autism spectrum disorders. Utilizing a mouse model with a Grin2b gene mutation, heightened neural activity and connectivity in the ACC was observed. Suppressing this hyperactivity normalized the...

Dasus , (edited )

Suppressing this hyperactivity normalized the sensory hypersensitivity, offering new insights into treatment options

What did they do to suppress it? (Asking for a friend.)

Edit: "Chemogenetic inhibition of ACC.."

Okay yeah a bit unaccessible to me my friend.

Dasus ,

Can’t we just call it like garbage or GIGO or something more accurate?

Gibberish?

Dasus ,

He knows it but ofc he pretends not to

Dasus ,

And this is why we can't have nice things democracy.

Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

https://time.com/4192760/hitler-munich-excerpt/

Dasus ,

Almost as if a few hundred years of selective breeding for blood sports to an animal that is exceedingly fast at adapting might make it predisposed to... uhm... kicking off.

Dasus ,

I'm definitely judging you for your use of single quotation marks. Not a lot, but... I am.

^^^Also metric superior^^^ goddamn superscript isn't working ffs this was meant to be a non-noticeable addition

Dasus ,

Well, it is. Objectively so. That's why it's the standardised system of measurement internationally..?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/eadf6f6a-a6c7-4bb2-9f83-09142bb59639.jpeg

Dasus ,

It wasn't about whether you use single or double as much as the context in which he used them.

Sort of like this, which has always annoyed me:

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/f1bd4de1-98ae-404a-b501-7788ab499169.jpeg

Dasus ,

A similar thing that's bothering me with the syntax of that sentence. It's just... off a bit.

See how I used italics instead of quotations marks? I feel like he (and the picture) used them sort of as emphasis for tone of voice. I get the need, but disagree using quotations to achieve it.

Dasus ,

No... no. Not everything, but rhetoric like in your comment.

You're literally cheering on eugenics, with a false hope of what it would achieve.

Dasus ,

I remember absinthe as delightful but I don’t remember it real well

Ah, I see you're man of (drinking) culture as well

Dasus ,

10 bucks says it was actually 10 years and you just forgot half of it

Dasus ,

Passion tea (which is made with hibiscus and lemongrass, and is very acidic) with heavy cream. It curdled damn near instantly and was just.... nasty.

The cumuccino

Dasus , (edited )

Why?

Because one was required.

When?

2001, heading to Assembly '01, a large LAN event in Helsinki.

Or was it '02?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • kbinchat
  • All magazines