@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted ,
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Wait, they have? I wonder how/if that would affect the functionality of apps like Newpipe/Freetube.

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted , (edited )
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Gross.

Welp, I sure hope either we stay on the winning side of the cat-and-mouse game or a lot of creators jump ship to other emerging platforms (not that there are many), because it'd be a damn shame to have to stop watching some of the creators I enjoy watching. Many of them are damned talented folks IMHO.

I've heard good things about Nebula, but sadly a lot of the channels I watch are not quite on there yet. Also, I'm broke, so there's that. Lol.

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted OP ,
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Oh! I get it now!

It's because while int() and float() are instantaneous, while input() uses the fourth dimension, time, and thus depends on a future input by the user. (May not make sense the way I'm putting it, but it makes sense to me. Lol.) In other words, while float() and int() have all the data they need to produce an output (i.e. what's in the parentheses), input() "outputs" the text in the parentheses, then puts itself into a pending state to await further user input, then outputs that second user input.

Am that about the right of it? :)

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted OP ,
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I think I misworded my thoughts, to be honest.

As I understand it:

int(2.1) would print out 2 since it just converts it to an integer by truncating it.

float(2) would print out 2.0 since it just converts it to a floating-point value by appending a .0 to the end.

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted OP ,
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

So input(x) prints out x and then puts itself into a waiting mode of sorts, waiting for the user to supply a value, and then once it has that value it outputs that particular value.

Am I right?

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted OP , (edited )
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

...I am confuzzled and slightly afraid. :|

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted OP ,
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Yay!

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted OP ,
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Thanks!

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted OP ,
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Oh!

I think I've not quite gotten to that part yet in the lesson. Lol.

But it's good to know, so thanks for pointing that out! I'll be sure to remember it when I get to that point. Haha.

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted OP , (edited )
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

That's a good point! That is something I've noticed. Traditional mathematics uses PEMDAS, which is bidirectional, but Python uses...PEMDRAS, I guess, which is...bi-monodirectional(?), that is, left-to-right in all cases, except in the exception of variables which is right-to-left.

I swear this makes sense to me. My brain just thinks weirdly. Haha.

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted OP ,
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

But then with Python we can have more complex “formulas”. For example, we can say laugh = “Ho” * 3

Yeah, you can multiply a string. The result is that print(laugh) prints “HoHoHo”.

Okay, that's just fucking cool. :3

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted ,
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Speaking as a Linux newb here...what exactly is a "prefix" in this context? :/

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted ,
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

So it's the components of Wine that produces its fabled compatibility layer?

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted ,
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Sorry for my ignorance, but could you ELI5 that for me?

I don't know what an arborescence is.

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted , (edited )
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I really hate to be "that person", but..........it's "run of the mill", not "run off the mill", friend.

It's a term from the late 1800s that refers to "manufactured goods not graded or sorted for quality—that is, a mill's products before they've been separated according to what will sell for how much." (Source for quote: https://www.merriam-webster.com/wordplay/where-does-run-of-the-mill-come-from)

Seriously, I'm not trying to be a grammar nazi here. Unless of course that was just autocorrect being a dick, in which case I'll go walk off a cliff now... :/

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted ,
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Of course. :)

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted ,
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Of course. :) I love learning about etymology and stuff, but I understand language is an evolving phenomenon so I try not to be a dick. Lol, hopefully, I succeeded.

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted ,
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

"If I have to be miserable, so does everyone else."

Yup, that's the kind of mindset a lot of these kinds of people have.

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted ,
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I just read the Wikipedia article on it.

 

Why did I read that?

 

Why did I read that?!

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted ,
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

This is why I keep a physical backup of all my emulator installers on an external hard drive. They get rid of some emulators, I still got my personal copies!

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted ,
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Because I live in America and there's pretty much no public transportation.

Trust me, if I had a train, I'd fucking use that sucker. Travel into town for my weekly errands AND I don't have to deal with people not using cruise control on a highway? SIGN ME THE FUCK. UP.

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted ,
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

cries in rural town in Michigan

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted ,
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

FUCK yes, at least if you live in a rural town. I live in a small farming town of 5 000 people. There is ONE grocery store here. Once a week, I go on errands (appointments, shopping, etc.) and I have to travel 25–30 minutes, or about 15 miles. And that's driving. There's no bus line, no train line, so if I wanted to walk, it'd take about 6 hours to walk.

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted , (edited )
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

There are other places to buy groceries: for example, there's a small carryout down the street and a Dollar General as well. But those aren't really "grocery stores" nor are they big stores. There are also a smattering of small businesses of course.

There also might be one or two in nearby small towns (which are still like 10–15 min drive away even then).

But for a good number of tasks, you still have to go into town, so my point still stands.

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted ,
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

As someone who has worked for Family Dollar (which is a part of the same industry ("discount variety store")), I absolutely hate that industry with a passion and refuse to shop at any store like Dollar General, Family Dollar, and Dollar Tree, etc. That whole industry is even more predatory towards employees than even regular retail stores are. That's how they get the items so cheap in the first place—aside from supply chain injustices (read: slavery, same as most other industries), it comes out of the workers, both in pay and workload.

Anyway, I didn't initially mean to go off on this spiel, so I'm sorry about that, and in any case my original point is still valid, I feel.

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted ,
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

It's cool. You kinda don't know until you work there.

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted ,
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I don't know. It's seemed fine to me. :)

What's simple to some people may not be as simple to others. That's why this community exists.

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted ,
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I agree completely. As someone who's fascinated with cosmology, I think this is a perfectly reasonable question and a perfect fit for this community.

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted ,
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I actually think it's really fucking (ducking?) cool.

I'm not gonna lie: it actually changed my perception of AI chat engines.

I truly believe now that it CAN be very good as a technology if used (and sourced) ethically. ChatGPT is very problematic in this respect, but Claude—though limited as a result—seems like a good step in the right direction.

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted ,
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Can you please provide a source for that claim?

Because I can find multiple sources that state they use separate LLMs but not one that states Claude uses Chat-GPT's LLM:

Claude's 195K context exceeds ChatGPT's 4K context in GPT-3.5.

Claude 3 was trained with data up to August 2023. In contrast, ChatGPT was trained on data leading up to January 2022.

Source: ”4 things Claude AI can do that ChatGPT can't”, ZDnet, 2024-04-20

ChatGPT [and] Claude ... all use different language models (LLMs) to process and respond to prompts ...

ChatGPT uses GPT-3.5 and GPT-4. If you're using the free version of ChatGPT, you'll be interacting with GPT-3.5. But if you're using ChatGPT Plus, OpenAI's paid chatbot version, you'll be interacting with GPT-4.

Claude, created by Anthropic, uses its most recent LLM version, Claude 2.1.

Source: "ChatGPT vs. Perplexity vs. Claude: AI Chatbot Tools Compared", How-To Geek, 2023-12-11

 

Also, Claude has a number of privacy & ethical restrictions baked into its protocols:

https://support.anthropic.com/en/articles/7996885-how-do-you-use-personal-data-in-model-training

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted ,
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

In this thread, everyone getting caught up on the first toot and not the second where he clarifies his point.

To be fair, the second part is not included in the image.

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted ,
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Not saying I blame you; you're bound by the limitations/restrictions of the platform.

I'm just saying it's not as obvious and so others may not have noticed it. :)

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • kbinchat
  • All magazines