@gregorum@lemm.ee cover
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

gregorum

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

Strange, as you’ve clearly laid out the odds, risks, etc. and you’re betting your life on your supposed “beliefs”.

Sure sounds like gambling to me…

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

A risk assessment is a normal part of gambling. You’re just describing games, like the one you’re playing now to rationalize your gambling with your own life by avoiding getting any sort of health insurance.

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

They are when you bet something on the outcome— ya know, gambling… like how you risk both your financial future and your life when you choose to not have health insurance.

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

That’s not how health insurance works. You would never get more than your medical costs and would almost always get less.

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

You’re gambling that there’s someone willing to pay that amount for your labor. The stakes? Your financial security.

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar
gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

but as a single policy-holder there is a good chance they will pay me more then I pay out making it gambling.

But the risk isn’t health insurance vs gambling. That’s a straw man, as not having health insurance is already gambling, and you’re trying to change the argument because your previous reasoning was shown to be faulty.

Nice try.

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

That is working.

Not if you lose your bet that anyone is willing to pay you your desired wage. Then it’s unemployment because you gambled and lost. And even if they do agree, it’s just luck that you won— but it’s still a gamble.

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

I’m not the one here with difficulty understanding what the word “gamble” means.

Hope this helps:

https://lemm.ee/pictrs/image/451709b0-5d15-4393-9f16-c3c9c3fe5f74.webp

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

Good thing it’s typically mandated by state law. You don’t have a choice when it’s deducted from your paycheck in most cases, and you’re automatically enrolled. (In some states and situations, it’s paid for by the employers). Whether you ever take advantage of that is another matter.

However, that’s irrelevant. All you’ve done here is demonstrate poor decision-making skills, and a profound misunderstanding of the concepts of both insurance and gambling.

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

Then that’s foolish, but not really relevant to this discussion about health insurance… Unless your point is to illustrate that you have no real idea about what insurance is or how it works.

gregorum , (edited )
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

You’re “beliefs” - as you’ve explained them - appear to be based on a complete lack of knowledge of what insurance is, what it’s for, or how it works as well as several attempts to redefine the word “gambling” tp what fits your “beliefs.” None of your “beliefs” are supported by the facts— they’re complete contradicted by them.

What are you getting out of this, by telling me I’m wrong in my beliefs and expanding the definition of gambling to literally anything?

you’re spreading false information (your “beliefs”) as fact which could be harmful to others of they’re foolish enough to believe you. I don’t have to gain something in return just to do the right thing by posting the correct information on response. Life isn’t some zero-sum game where I have to be motivate by personal gain simply because your feelings got hurt.

Oh, and I didn’t define gambling— the dictionary did. Blaming me for pointing that out is juvenile. Your interpretations of those definitions are entirely on you.

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

Since you haven’t managed to make your point in nearly a dozen comments on this subject…. I doubt that

Unless you’re saying that you wasted all this time discussing something other than your point, in which case… why?

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

Changing the subject again?

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

Coming from the person who doesn’t “get” what insurance is or the meaning of the word “gambling” means until I had to post the definition from a dictionary.

https://i.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTc5MGI3NjExdTBjMDF0MWhvcjFjNTdvNGF2MmxjOWxsYmxkOWdmYnlla21pcmZ2cyZlcD12MV9pbnRlcm5hbF9naWZfYnlfaWQmY3Q9Zw/1AIeYgwnqeBUxh6juu/giphy.gif

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

We were talking about health insurance. Now you’re talking about quotation marks and the insecurities you have in your beliefs.

Those two subjects are not the same.

You have changed the subject. I can only surmise it is because you can no longer defend your “beliefs” and wish to distract with a Red Herring.

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

I didn’t define gambling— the dictionary did. Blaming me because certain words have certain meanings is irrational, and is certainly not good-faith. And attacking me personally just because you have no other argument is just an Ad hominem.

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

I don’t have health insurance because I do not agree with gambling.

That is, itself, gambling. I’ve proven that by *posting the definition of the word “gambling.”

Again, for reference:

https://lemm.ee/pictrs/image/a1d6c689-4eab-4d95-afba-bc8fe2239501.webp

That is the entirety of my side of this conversation to you so far.

Except for when you tried to change the subject to unemployment insurance, crossing the road, or my usage of quotation marks.

You are telling me that I’m wrong to believe what I do and you seem very invested in doing so.

I have told you - repeatedly - that your “beliefs” are clearly (based on everything you keep saying) based on a complete lack of understanding as to what insurance is, what it’s for, and how it works as well as not really knowing the definition or the word “gambling”. If you heard something other than what I’ve said, that’s on you.

I don’t want to walk away from this conversation because I feel like it might be rude and that you might actually need someone to talk to.

Is everything going well in your life?

Oh, more ad hominem attacks and deflection. Seems like you’re all out of arguments.

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

Have lost track of what you’ve said already? Are you having a sudden attack of very convenient amnesia?

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

Make Trump take a cognitive test issued by a board certified and independent neurologist and gerontologist.

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

No, that’s the same problem: fuckwit execs who don’t give a shit about workers.

gregorum , (edited )
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

Kids ruin everything. That kid ruined this episode.

Edit: also, what’s Moffat’s deal with medical treatment/hospitals? Did some nurse or doctor abuse him as a child? I get that some people don’t like going to the doctor or the hospitals, but every time Moffat writes a story that is even somewhat related to the subject, the doctors and nurses or medical personnel are always evil or monsters or something. In the first episodes of his era was Rory working as a nurse in a hospital that turned out to be a Cyberman factory.

Another is the two streams episode where Amy spends 30+ years dodging medical bots trying to inoculate her.

gregorum , (edited )
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

Kinda surprised that something sane tumbled out of his mouth.

edit: apparently, it wasn't as sane as the headline made it sound, lol

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

But he isn’t right nearly that often, lol

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

I stand corrected

qkall , to Showerthoughts
@qkall@mastodon.social avatar

I absolutely love milkshakes. I just wish they loved me more.

Is this what god feels like?

@showerthoughts

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

Thanks, Ken

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

Does the UK flag even have an “upside down”?

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

Wow, that’s so subtle!

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

See, that’s where I was confused. Since it has rotational symmetry, I didn’t notice, since I just took an image and rotated it— but it didn’t consider how a flag hangs from a flagpole, with one edge having eyeholes for a rope or string. This means it would be inverted, not rotated, and the stripes would be different.

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

I love escargot. It may be one of my favorite things.

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

He should start practicing the window swan-dive into a cup of polonium tea now. The real trick is hitting the two bullets in the back of your head on the way down!

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

That was 20 years ago. Let it go

Besides, there must be more prescient examples of Sony being shit bags.

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

So what? How does he think Meta is liable for anything here?

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

There must’ve been an age limit. No “ephebephelia”, no Milo.

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

Cyclops. What a toolbox.

And in the X-Men ‘97 reboot, WOW! have they ramped up the toolbox factor.

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

GASP!

But how‽

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

He was no longer playing Superman at that point

gregorum , (edited )
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

The artist isn’t a framework. An artist creates a framework, from which they must eventually be separated (in your wording).

So, once an artist is prolific enough to establish (as you put it) a “framework”, then one can separate the judgement of the “framework” form the individual artist themselves.

Does that make sense?

Edit: if not, maybe I can clarify further

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

To anyone with a brain, that definition Proves me correct. Not you.

gregorum ,
@gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

I don’t have to. Plenty of others with poli-sci degrees did.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • kbinchat
  • All magazines