yokonzo ,

Why do they keep making Garfield movies they keep flopping

altima_neo ,
@altima_neo@lemmy.zip avatar

Yeah but what about Garfield?

No_Ones_Slick_Like_Gaston ,

The header is, Furiosa barely topped Garfield. So there's that.

FenrirIII ,
@FenrirIII@lemmy.world avatar

Garfield always struck me as a power-bottom.

steeznson ,

"Furiosa edges Garfield"

steeznson ,

Come at the king, you best not miss

Num10ck ,

apparently its not bad except it has nothing to do with Garfield, and it has nothing for grownups.

TheBat ,
@TheBat@lemmy.world avatar

That's a shame. Chris Hemsworth is fantastic in this. Felt like he was having time of his life.

protist ,

Chris Hemsworth is in Garfield?

TheBat ,
@TheBat@lemmy.world avatar

Would've been better if he was. Then after Barbenheimer we would've had Furifield.

Illuminostro ,

He played Odie

CookieOfFortune ,

Watched it over the weekend and was rather underwhelmed. It felt “cheap” compared to Fury Road. The CGI was quite terrible in comparison, especially when they showed some scenes from the last movie during credits. It’s just so obvious they paid less detail to the effects and it seemed like a significant decrease in their use of practical effects. Add to that some of the effects were just plain bad. AND worse of all

Tap for spoiler

They skipped the final fight scene completely!

Also there was just too much talking. Fury Road was great because the world building was done without extra dialog. Furiosa just felt like any other Hollywood film with nothing special at all.

Illuminostro ,

I saw a clip of her crawling on the top of a truck with some kind parachute or something attached to it, and it looked fucking terrible.

ryven ,

I really liked it. Bikes and cars go vroom, guns go bang, flamethrowers go woosh. 10/10. I'm contemplating going again next weekend.

My roommate was bored. Didn't like the writing, didn't like Taylor-Joy's performance. He rated it "not good." I didn't really disagree with any of his specific complaints, I just didn't care about them.

I suspect your mileage really depends on what kind of audience member you are.

Fal ,
@Fal@yiffit.net avatar

This is exactly the experience with me and my wife too. She was not at all impressed with any of the performances. And I don't disagree I just don't really care that much.

Though it's not even close to as good as fury road. I described it as "fine"

Sir_Kevin ,
@Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Bikes and cars go vroom, guns go bang, flamethrowers go woosh. 10/10.

That's just it, I went in to see a Mad Max movie and that's what I got. Very satisfied! I think anyone complaining about this movie went in with the wrong expectations.
I told my gf before the movie, "I want to see high speed chases, shit flying through the air, explosions, stunts and at last one thing I've never seen before.". I got all that shit and then some! Fuck yeah!

Psythik ,

ADHD moviegoer, here; sounds like my kind of film. Dialog never mattered much to me because I can't follow it half the time. Which really sucks because I can't enjoy shows like The Wire, Sopranos, and Boardwalk Empire. People spend too much time talking and not enough time doing, and I just get confused and annoyed cause I have no idea what's going on.

Hux ,

One of the theaters I used to go to is now a massive Amazon warehouse.

I’m ok with that—in practice and principle.

Subverb ,

I lost interest with Taylor-Joy playing the character to be honest. I'm sure I'll watch it but not in the theater.

This from a guy with an original Road Warrior theater poster in my garage and a hand-built, contest-winning Imortan Joe costume.

TheBat ,
@TheBat@lemmy.world avatar

She has like 30 lines in the whole film but she's nailed Theron's voice somehow. And for like first half of the movie, there's even younger Furiosa played by different actress.

FenrirIII ,
@FenrirIII@lemmy.world avatar

I watched an interview with her where she said they used CGI to slightly alter the actress(es?) playing her younger self to look more like her (grown up).

Sir_Kevin ,
@Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Honestly, she was pretty badass in this movie.

NIB , (edited )

Other than the ending dialogue, which i wasnt a big fan of probably because of the writing, her acting is superb. She is almost always silent so that makes it even more challenging. Her eyes do the talking.

jacksilver ,

How do you know which one to look at (listen to?)

setsneedtofeed , (edited )
@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world avatar

Furiosa was fine. In a vacuum, it was actually pretty good, but in being a sequel to Fury Road it can't shake comparisons.

I figure that it looking so visually similar to Fury Road in trailers made a lot of people ask themselves why even bother watching it when they'd already seen Fury Road. The title including "A Mad Max Saga" is clunky and throws up big vibes of this being a tack on story (which it is), which really doesn't create the kind of hype wave needed to reach out to people who are already cynical about going to a theater.

The word of mouth all seems to start with "Well it wasn't as good as Fury Road, but..." which isn't going to put a fire under the seats of undecided people.

Crackhappy ,
@Crackhappy@lemmy.world avatar

I enjoyed all the weirdness of it.

TheBat ,
@TheBat@lemmy.world avatar

sequel

Prequel.

Also Fury Road happens over 48 hours. Furiosa spans like 15 years.

setsneedtofeed ,
@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world avatar

Prequel

You got me. It's still a follow up movie that looks very similar but lesser in the trailers, and has a clunky title.

Also Fury Road happens over 48 hours. Furiosa spans like 15 years.

What does that have to do with people not watching it? I'm talking about marketing and word of mouth impressions. Plot details aren't very important to that.

fsxylo , (edited )

I just don't believe an actress who can't even act out eating a cheese burger like it wasn't beneath her could act like a post apocalyptic hard ass.

Also, this thumbnail makes me think this prequel is really just the origin story of her buzz cut.

p03locke ,
@p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

I didn't really have a problem with Anya Taylor-Joy in the Queen's Gambit. What makes you think she can't act?

fsxylo , (edited )

I didn't have a huge problem with Queen's gambit. I was not convinced that her character in The Menu was actually a working class person, though.

She strikes me as the kind of Actress who has a brand, and that brand has nothing to do with her acting skills.

To clarify, I mean she seems like her brand involves "don't eat that cheeseburger too much like a poor person", or she will spoil her image.

Sir_Kevin ,
@Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

What in the world are you on about?

aleph ,
@aleph@lemm.ee avatar

And the award for the dumbest take of the thread goes to ∆

fsxylo ,

Always some jumped up dumbfuck begging for my attention.

Here you go! Hopefully it fills some void for you.

CaptDust ,

I wonder if it'll do big numbers on home release, I think many people are waiting for that

superweeniehutjrs ,

I plan to go see furiosa soon. Probably my only 2024 movie

metallic_substance ,

It's the same for me too. I went last night and there were maybe 20 other people in the theater with us. I live in a very densely populated area. RIP theaters I guess

Iheartcheese ,
@Iheartcheese@lemmy.world avatar
solarvector ,

Looks more like it mildly underperformed relative to the overall market being very low, and getting lower.

FenrirIII ,
@FenrirIII@lemmy.world avatar

I skipped Dune 2 in theatre's. Watched it on Max last week. Why bother going to theatres?

jacksilver ,

There are a lot of movies I would agree with you on, but watching Dune (part 1 or 2) in the theaters was amazing. Having it on the big screen with theater level surround sound beats anything I have at home.

ziltoid101 ,
@ziltoid101@lemmy.world avatar

Shame, i thought Furiosa was awesome, although there were only about 5 people in the cinema. The critics seem to be giving pretty favourable reviews too, would definitely recommend going and checking it out. Hope this isnt the nail in the coffin of Mad Max.

Gigan ,
@Gigan@lemmy.world avatar

Hope this isnt the nail in the coffin of Mad Max.

Maybe it's a sign that a Mad Max movie should have Mad Max in it.

Pistcow ,

Or that going the theater sucks ass. Why go when I have a 70 Oled and almos sound system. Dealing with the jack asses that talk, text, or chew loudly isn't worth the hassle.

chknbwl ,
@chknbwl@lemmy.world avatar

Dude, I only have a 36" LED and budget sound bar and I still wouldn't go to the cinema. It's cheaper to rent the movie online, I can ensure my popcorn is perfectly buttered and not burnt (truly a game changer), and I don't have to shush 2.5 teenagers every matinee night.

Theaters are dead, man.

Lemmy_2019 ,

32" here and same.

kratoz29 ,

I would like to live that dream too, for now I do fine with my 50 inch TV with light balls (I don't even know how they are called, most likely dead leds), no sound bar, but hey, at least I have a Nvidia Shield TV 2019 Pro, which it is too damn slow for my setup on Kodi most of the times, but it behaves pretty well for everything else.

variants ,

I have a nice TV but it still doesn't compare to going to the movies, especially now that they have beer on tap and a nasty hotdog what more do you need

bradbeattie ,

In addition, theatres advertise a starting time of X:00, but the movie can sometimes start as late as X:30 after 30 fucking minutes of ads and trailers. That was my previous and last experience in a theatre.

nokturne213 , (edited )
@nokturne213@sopuli.xyz avatar

Maybe it did have Mad Max in it.

state_electrician ,

Mad Max had three movies already. I don't think he needs more. One thing I enjoyed about Fury Road was that he was basically a supporting character for Furiosa.

nogooduser ,

The Dogman / Mad Max was in the credits but I don’t remember him in the film.

thoro ,

He's the guy who's overlooking her from a cliff when she faints in the desert after losing her arm

CaptainSpaceman ,

Im not paying to see ATJ

aleph , (edited )
@aleph@lemm.ee avatar

Furiosa has a few major challenges up against it, really:

  • Its running time is longer than the average Blockbuster
  • it's R rated and violent
  • Mad Max is a fairly niche IP to begin with
  • It's a backstory for a secondary (albeit important) character from Fury Road
  • People are feeling the pinch financially right now

Having Tom Hardy playing Max as the main character might have bumped the opening weekend Box Office a bit, but not hugely IMO.

TheBat ,
@TheBat@lemmy.world avatar

it's R rated and violent

You listed positive among the drawbacks.

And yeah, even though it wasn't constant action like Fury Road, it definitely felt gorier.

Exusia ,
@Exusia@lemmy.world avatar

R is typically a drawback financially because it can't be marketed as a "family friendly outing".
Even a PG13 movie gets mom+dad+kids ticket sales, where rated R gets Mom this week and Dad next week.

delitomatoes ,

I don't get the part about the economy not doing well, stock market is at all time high and houses are selling for insane prices

Exusia , (edited )
@Exusia@lemmy.world avatar

Good joke mate. I laughed.

Sir_Kevin ,
@Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

It exceeded my expectations. Fucking awesome movie!

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • kbinchat
  • All magazines