@berkeleyblue@lemmy.world avatar

berkeleyblue

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

berkeleyblue ,
@berkeleyblue@lemmy.world avatar

For AirTags, those notifications should only start if:

  • The AirTag has not been with his owner for more than 4 hours
  • The AirTag is moving
  • The AirTag persistently stays close to another device that isn’t associated with the AirTag owners Apple ID

For Teachers this shouldn’t be an issue unless their students have tecb challenged parent. AirTags arent meant for tracking kids. If it’s their AirTag, they are with them and the alarm won’t trigger. If they have a shared AirTag (possible since iOS 17) they are with theyr own AirTag and the alarm won’t trigger. If they got one that is ONLY registered to their parents, then it will trigger the Anti Stalking feature and those parents should be educated on their problematic use of an AirTag.

Those kids should have an Apple Watch, all the tracking options for parents, none of the hassle of stalking alerts. Or they now just use a shared AirTag which they would then also need to have an Apple ID enabled device with them. So the watch is usually the more afordable and versatile option.

berkeleyblue ,
@berkeleyblue@lemmy.world avatar

He should have let an AI proofread this…

berkeleyblue ,
@berkeleyblue@lemmy.world avatar

Also the country that still predominantly runs on coal for its power grid… one would think they have bigger fish to fry. EVs are a net positive after about 40’000km compared to ICE Cars. (Even faster depending on the source of charging)

berkeleyblue ,
@berkeleyblue@lemmy.world avatar

Which would be?

It’s nonsense. Out of 100 bear encounters about 1 turns violent. Now, how many men does the average women come in contact to daily and how many of them turn violent? I’m pretty sure the numbers are much, much lower than that for a bear encounter.

My Wife walked passed approximately 1’000 just today. No one even talked to her in a weird way. This whole argument is just fear mongering with sociallly acceptable sexism. This doesn’t solve any problems.

Also, statistically, strangers are the last people tk worry about. The overwhelming majority of abuse victims know their abuser or are even related. You should be more afraid to see uncle Frank and aunt Jenny in the woods than any random man.

berkeleyblue ,
@berkeleyblue@lemmy.world avatar

Not at all. You said being alone in a forest with a man is more dangerous than a bear, and I said that’s statistically nonsense.

Just because I wrote more than 2 sentences, doesn’t make that a gish gallop.

There are 2 premises:

  1. Bears are dangerous (I agree)
  2. A random man in a forest is more dangerous to a woman than that bear (I strongly disagree)

I showed my numbers for that 1 argument and that’s it. I’m happy to be proven wrong, if you have anything more than “it just is”.

I’m not defensive I find this comparison to be simply ridiculous.

berkeleyblue ,
@berkeleyblue@lemmy.world avatar

Bear: Couldn’t tell you what he’s up to even if it wanted to

Men: Can actually listen and talk their intentions.

Why is a man less predictable in this case? You all just claim things without the slightest bit of argument behind it… so please tell my why that would be the case.

Thanks.

berkeleyblue ,
@berkeleyblue@lemmy.world avatar

Passkeys should display a QR Code for you to scan with a trusted device if you try to use them on a device that doesn’t have your passkey stored.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • kbinchat
  • All magazines