This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

null ,
@null@slrpnk.net avatar

But no one in your screenshot is saying that?

null ,
@null@slrpnk.net avatar

I don't see them telling anyone to "say you're sorry" either?

null ,
@null@slrpnk.net avatar

Not really though

null ,
@null@slrpnk.net avatar

You won't get through to him, he's way too deep in dreamland. Just check his history.

null ,
@null@slrpnk.net avatar

Whether you think that applies in this particular case is another question

If this was what you were presenting this as (a logical response to the argument above) then it shouldn't be another question. It should apply directly to this argument.

Your comment only applies to a negotiation between 2 parties and doesn't address the actual problem at hand whatsoever. So yeah, its not a logical response to the above argument at all.

null ,
@null@slrpnk.net avatar

It certainly does not establish "the logical framework" for the opposing case. Again, as I explained, the framework deals with 2 parties negotiating, which is not applicable to the argument presented.

null ,
@null@slrpnk.net avatar

Real end-game communism is functional, stateless, declarative, reproducible, and defined in a single configuration file.

null ,
@null@slrpnk.net avatar

Yup, I've seen enough posts where bots are clearly reposting (huge) comment chains from older posts to know the place is absolutely crawling with them

Subreddit Simulator wasn't an experiment, it was a proof-of-concept.

null ,
@null@slrpnk.net avatar

Dead internet theory

null ,
@null@slrpnk.net avatar

Who said it was a legal requirement?

null ,
@null@slrpnk.net avatar

Who said it was illegal?

null ,
@null@slrpnk.net avatar

Needs = laws?

They'll oust a CEO who doesn't fill that need. No legal action required.

null ,
@null@slrpnk.net avatar

The shareholders will oust the CEO who doesn't meet that need. No legal action required.

Maybe other people inaccurately say it is a law, but this is not an example of that. Especially since you said "FACTUALLY INCORRECT".

No, no incorrect facts were stated.

null ,
@null@slrpnk.net avatar

Huh? You claimed that "need" = "law" -- which is clearly nonsense.

That's where we are.

null ,
@null@slrpnk.net avatar

This is highly pedantic, and i apologize for doing this. However, I can't leave this alone

It's prefers

null ,
@null@slrpnk.net avatar

So I just install the app, sign up, and I can start watching whatever?

null ,
@null@slrpnk.net avatar

Well that certainly sounds more difficult than any streaming service I've ever used.

null ,
@null@slrpnk.net avatar

Okay, but I can pretty much guarantee my mom couldn't figure out how to set that up.

But she can get Disney+ going no problem.

null ,
@null@slrpnk.net avatar

That's not gonna help if he's looking for hard to find track as flacs though.

null ,
@null@slrpnk.net avatar

The humor in the games is definitely "stupid" but not as cringe as this movie looks.

null ,
@null@slrpnk.net avatar

Bad take. Read the other comments in this thread for the actual reasons.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • kbinchat
  • All magazines