@mirekdlugosz@fosstodon.org cover
@mirekdlugosz@fosstodon.org avatar

mirekdlugosz

@[email protected]

I do #programming and #testing

I ❤️ #OpenSource
I use #Linux since 2006 :debian:
I publish code on :github: #GitHub ⬇️

I mostly do #automation and #WebDev #backend #frontend
I ❤️ :python: #Python
I also work in :javascript: #JavaScript, :rstats: #rstats, :bash: #shell and :php: #PHP

I'm formally educated in #socialscience and #compsci

I prefer 📖 longer pieces, and sometimes I publish them on my #blog ⬇️

#fedi22

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

EVDHmn , to philosophy group
@EVDHmn@ecoevo.social avatar



@philosophy

At the height of the great method debate in the 20th century what were Carl Popper and Thomas Kuhn debating about? How long did the discourse start last etc? Who won the debate? What was the take away and where are we at with it today?

Context: reading some of lately as well.
I picture the mind kind of like a garden, all the parts I’m learning revolve around a similar theme which is mostly around some of the nuts and bolts of .

mirekdlugosz ,
@mirekdlugosz@fosstodon.org avatar

@EVDHmn @philosophy

Not trying to be mean, but have you checked Wikipedia? They have a page on this specific topic, which seems alright at the quick glance.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is free online high quality source on these topics, although it tends to be quite deep.

mirekdlugosz ,
@mirekdlugosz@fosstodon.org avatar

@EVDHmn @philosophy

Popper is now mostly known for refutation, which most scientists know, but rarely follow in the pure form. Kuhn was much closer to how science is actually being done. Arguably, Kuhn was more of sociologist of science than philosopher of science. Both are considered wrong in their own way, i.e. their theories have known problems and gaps.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • kbinchat
  • All magazines
    •