@mario_angst_sci@fediscience.org cover
@mario_angst_sci@fediscience.org avatar

mario_angst_sci

@[email protected]

Postdoc
University of Zurich, Digital Society Initiative
(part-time; 🧒🧒)
Sustainability | Digitalization | Governance | Urban | Networks | Policy in the Anthropocene | #RStats & 🐍

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

ingorohlfing , to AcademicChatter group
@ingorohlfing@mastodon.social avatar

There must be an easier way to work with review/submission websites.
One registers a master password with the publisher that works for all journals. Every time an account is created with a new journal of this publisher, the master password is linked to it and one could start right away @academicchatter

mario_angst_sci ,
@mario_angst_sci@fediscience.org avatar

@ingorohlfing @academicchatter Yeah it is maddening WHY ON EARTH IS IT CALLED MANUSCRIPT CENTRAL, NOTHING CENTRAL ABOUT IT 😾.
I have to say however, now that I am not reviewing for any of the big, for-profit publishers anymore, I am much more willing to put up with a bit of friction.
No excuse for them though, making the kind of profits that they are making.

mario_angst_sci ,
@mario_angst_sci@fediscience.org avatar

@jtmuehlberg @ingorohlfing @pkraus @academicchatter I have used it for some, just yesterday for a review submitted through editorialmanager.com (whoever runs that service (?), it was for a Bristol University Press journal). Works fine, and a good use case for ORCID I agree.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • kbinchat
  • All magazines
    •