ingorohlfing ,
@ingorohlfing@mastodon.social avatar

There must be an easier way to work with review/submission websites.
One registers a master password with the publisher that works for all journals. Every time an account is created with a new journal of this publisher, the master password is linked to it and one could start right away @academicchatter

mario_angst_sci ,
@mario_angst_sci@fediscience.org avatar

@ingorohlfing @academicchatter Yeah it is maddening WHY ON EARTH IS IT CALLED MANUSCRIPT CENTRAL, NOTHING CENTRAL ABOUT IT 😾.
I have to say however, now that I am not reviewing for any of the big, for-profit publishers anymore, I am much more willing to put up with a bit of friction.
No excuse for them though, making the kind of profits that they are making.

pkraus ,
@pkraus@berlin.social avatar

@ingorohlfing @academicchatter it's called ORCiD, no?

ingorohlfing OP ,
@ingorohlfing@mastodon.social avatar

@pkraus @academicchatter Once ORCID has been authorized for an account, yes. For which one first needs to log in in the traditional way. I would not mind using ORCID as the Master password from the start.

jtmuehlberg ,
@jtmuehlberg@mastodon.online avatar

@ingorohlfing @pkraus @academicchatter I haven't seen ORCID being used for authentication with conference/journal submission systems. But they do so for some services such as Overleaf.

mario_angst_sci ,
@mario_angst_sci@fediscience.org avatar

@jtmuehlberg @ingorohlfing @pkraus @academicchatter I have used it for some, just yesterday for a review submitted through editorialmanager.com (whoever runs that service (?), it was for a Bristol University Press journal). Works fine, and a good use case for ORCID I agree.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • kbinchat
  • All magazines