@ingorohlfing@mastodon.social cover
@ingorohlfing@mastodon.social avatar

ingorohlfing

@[email protected]

I am here for all interesting and funny posts on the social sciences, broadly understood, academia, teaching, research and science

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

ingorohlfing , to sociology group
@ingorohlfing@mastodon.social avatar

A Snapshot of Inter-Methodology Mixing: The Intersection, Integration and Merging of Methodologies
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15586898241255221
I am all for systemizing methods and approaches, but I wonder then and again whether the field of is overdoing it with its labels and concepts 1/ @sociology @politicalscience

ingorohlfing , to AcademicChatter group
@ingorohlfing@mastodon.social avatar

SPPS has issued an "expression of concern" about an article from 2015 because first author had two articles retracted and the PhD degree revoked bc of data fabrication. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/19485506241261712 As I see it, there is no direct evidence yet for data fabrication for the article under scrutiny.
Honest question: Is it justified to post an expression of concern? I see the that the odds of data fabrication are increasing for every other article by the author that is retracted. 1/
@academicchatter

ingorohlfing , to AcademicChatter group
@ingorohlfing@mastodon.social avatar

There must be an easier way to work with review/submission websites.
One registers a master password with the publisher that works for all journals. Every time an account is created with a new journal of this publisher, the master password is linked to it and one could start right away @academicchatter

ingorohlfing OP ,
@ingorohlfing@mastodon.social avatar

@pkraus @academicchatter Once ORCID has been authorized for an account, yes. For which one first needs to log in in the traditional way. I would not mind using ORCID as the Master password from the start.

ingorohlfing , to AcademicChatter group
@ingorohlfing@mastodon.social avatar

Elsevier unveils Scopus for research reviews | Times Higher Education (THE)
https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/elsevier-launches-scopus-ai-bot-literature-reviews I couldn't find information about pricing, but it seems safe to assume it is not for free. Meaning institutions have to pay for a tool that likely has been 1/ @academicchatter

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • kbinchat
  • All magazines