Resonosity ,

I wonder what this means this for the SAE and USDOT adopting the Tesla charging network and connector as standard for future EV development.

poo ,
@poo@lemmy.world avatar

Well that's embarrassing

nikaaa ,

Crazy. I've been a long-term Musk supporter (because of meaningful business targets: EVs and Mars colonization), but these recent events I cannot support. Laying off employees while not at the same time demanding Universal Basic Income on a state level (so that no single corporation is disadvantaged) is a death sentence to the worker population, and that, I cannot support. I'm out.

AdrianTheFrog ,
@AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world avatar

I stopped being a Musk supporter when I found out he had a twitter.

I still think all of his companies are doing (to various extents) genuinely cool and useful things, but Musk in recent years at least has shown himself to be a terrible manager (not to mention a terrible person)

noxy ,
@noxy@yiffit.net avatar

Did you support him when he was falsely accusing a rescue diver of being a pedophile?

sebinspace ,

Mate, be willing to accept people when they finally change their mind. Otherwise they’ll find they might aswell stay in their echo chamber.

Namaste.

noxy ,
@noxy@yiffit.net avatar

I do. And I agree with you. Doesn't mean my question isn't a fair one to ask.

Raxiel ,

That was the point the mask slipped for me

squirrelwithnut ,

Is that because the automotive industry decided to go with the North American standard for rapid chargers instead of Tesla's? If so, while heartless, it makes sense from a business standpoint.

dual_sport_dork ,
@dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world avatar

?

The NACS connector is the Tesla connector. NACS was entirely their doing; Tesla won this format war. So what's for them to be salty about?

The only wrinkle is that older Teslas require a reflash to work with the new (or rather old, same as CCS) communication standard that would be used by NACS equipped non-Tesla charging stations.

skozzii ,

He either didn't get his pay package so he is burning the whole place down, or he has really lost his mind.

lorkano ,

Why not both?

Zink ,

Maybe he figures that crashing and burning as many giant global companies/brands as possible will make him more memorable for the history books.

umbrella ,
@umbrella@lemmy.ml avatar

yeah thats what you get for allowing a corpo to build a proprietary, closed charging ecosystem.

AdrianTheFrog ,
@AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world avatar

It hasn't been proprietary for a little while, its an official standard now. They had to open it in order to receive government funding for charger construction.

The North American Charging Standard (NACS), being standardized as SAE J3400, is an electric vehicle (EV) charging connector system developed by Tesla, Inc. It has been used by all North American market Tesla vehicles since 2021 and was opened for use by other manufacturers in November 2022. It is backwards compatible with the proprietary Tesla connectors made before 2021. (link)

arc ,

When you have a narcissistic sociopath for a boss don't expect job security. All these layoffs and his insane letter will do is cultivate toadying, fear, distrust, cliques and a culture of backstabbing within Tesla.

Thorndike ,

Ahhh, the trustworthy test. Sounds like the same type of test that Trump plans to use in his hiring process. Coincidence? I think not. All part of the fascist playbook.

KingThrillgore ,
@KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml avatar

Killed the Golden Goose moment

recursive_recursion ,
@recursive_recursion@programming.dev avatar

huh

I wonder what's the probability that the current EV makers might unite to create an open source standard alternative now that this has happened?

Khanzarate ,

There are already 2 of them.

NACS, which is essentially the Tesla charger, was made available to other car manufacturers at no cost already, in 2022. Due to a few reasons, among them the existence of Tesla superchargers already deployed, a lot of companies have adopted this as their charger for newer cars.

Even if Tesla went down completely, their charger is already open, so nah I don't expect any changes based on this.

TrueStoryBob ,

Okay, that makes sense. Was going to ask how proprietary/locked that charger system was as it seems to be the immerging standard.

Khanzarate ,

Yeah I'm kinda surprised they made it open, to be honest. But they did, and its in a way that can't be retracted, so nothing depends on their continuing good behavior.

AdrianTheFrog ,
@AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world avatar

A requirement for them to receive $7.5 billion in government funding for charger construction was for them to allow other cars to charge on their network, which required opening the standard.

phoenixz ,

Open source? Standards?

What?

Do that and Lose the chance of earning billions in royalties if WE manage to corner the market?

None of that will happen unless, say, the European Union will force manufacturers hands.

noxy ,
@noxy@yiffit.net avatar

I hope that's a wakeup call to all the other automakers who announced plans to switch from CCS to NAC"S"

Big fucking mistake basing future plans on that company

jj4211 ,

Well, not necessarily.

Short term, they dramatically increased access to credible fast charging.

Longer term, near as I can tell, third party NACS fast charging will commence. So while this may be a disaster for Tesla and the Tesla charging network per se, long term it has room for another company to come along and displace Tesla.

If such a company were looking for a team to drive such an initiative, it seems we all know where to find one now...

laurelraven ,

Honestly, EV-Go or Electrify America building NACS chargers isn't going to fix anything. The plug isn't what makes the Supercharger network appealing, it's the fact they ensure the stations are ubiquitous, fully functional, and the payment is seamless. If he's throwing out the team that is making sure those things continue to be true, the charging problem is only going to get worse.

banana_lama ,

Why does it matter? The standard is now open and can be used by everyone. It's just like CCS now from a usability pov but with many more chargers

frezik ,

If anything, it was a major coup by Tesla to make their plug the standard when they have the largest existing charging network for that plug. Now they're in a position of letting other networks catch up.

This decision is bafflingly stupid. Is firing people the only way Musk can get hard anymore?

banana_lama ,

I didn't really follow. Because the way it happened was, Tesla can make money from it's charging stations and other OEMs get a robust charging network.

laurelraven ,

How robust it'll be by the time other cars get access is now rather questionable with this firing spree

banana_lama ,

It's a headstart for a robust charging network while other charging station companies build more to catch up

JeffKerman1999 ,

How many non-tesla nacs charges are there?

banana_lama ,

How many ccs chargers are there compared to nas? That's the question that matters to GM Ford and other automakers

JeffKerman1999 ,

My point is that even if nacs is open, it is a monopoly. Tomorrow Tesla decides to ask 100$ per month to access the network and you can't go somewhere else. In EU the mandatory plug is the same for everyone and Tesla chargers must have ccs2 and Tesla cars must have ccs2..

banana_lama ,

I understand that. But building chargers using their ports is an option and will be something that happens. It just answers the customers of other OEMs of whether to charge their cars now.
And even if Tesla controls a significant portion of the charging infrastructure now there'll be others that build chargers with that standard with time.
And I'm sure there was some closed door agreement they came up with on pricing

JeffKerman1999 ,

Dude it's how many years of "electrify America" project that is supposedly supported by the biggest car manufacturer and the network is terrible. Nobody will go compete with nacs because Tesla has the market penetration and it's ubiquitous. I guess the mon-tesla will change the plugs on some select locations and that's it. But we'll see how it goes with the supercharger network after musk fired the entire team...

Gur814 ,

NACS is an open standard. Tesla could fold tomorrow and it would still be a good idea for the other manufacturers to switch to it so we don’t have multiple competing plug standards in this country.

wizzor ,

Is it really so? The specs are open, and Tesla has been permissive about letting other companies use their patents, but what would happen if they changed their minds?

nxdefiant ,

nothing, it's an open standard now: SAE J3400

Passerby6497 ,

The death spiral begins.

SecretSauces ,
@SecretSauces@lemmy.world avatar

Begins? It's been slowly getting worse for years

SuperSpruce ,

Time to short the stock then, if they are not gonna invest in their own future.

PrettyFlyForAFatGuy ,

Layoffs tend to precipitate big stock price jumps in my experience. Investors love job losses

Pohl ,

My dude, never underestimate wall streets ability to ignore tsla failing. They will hold that stock. Shorting tsla is a fools errand. The people who own tsla are immune to reality.

Everything good that tsla owners were banking on has already happened. The gravy days are in the past but… the insane valuation persists.

You cannot short stupidity.

hermitix_world ,

Ready made team about to take over the EV charging market.

Hossenfeffer ,
@Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk avatar

Musk also told staff that he would ask for the resignation of any executive "who retains more than three people who don't obviously pass the excellent, necessary and trustworthy test."

Pssst. Elon. You're not any of those three things.

macrocephalic ,

Shouldn't he resign based on this criterion?

unreasonabro ,

that would imply self-awareness and some degree of competence

nilloc ,

And not being a raging narcissist. But then he wouldn’t be a billionaire, so it would be a win win.

laurelraven ,

No, just the executive who's retaining him, obviously

Which... I guess that means the board?

postmateDumbass ,
unreasonabro ,

On the one hand, funny, but i mean, who even cares though, everything Elon is going to zero, because he only has terrible ideas

the idea that you should buy a car whose features are disabled unless you pay extra for them is probably the main driver of enshittification in society. It's the enshittification of ownership. Of course capitalists love this idea, but no actual human being should.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • kbinchat
  • All magazines