I feel for the teacher if they don't have a continuing contract, yet. You're completely dependent on staying in the good graces of your principal to have a job for the next year, and you will only be recommended for a continuing contract with the support of a principal.
But if the teacher had a continuing contract, then they probably should have told the principal to censor the student's work themselves if they wanted it done. Or that you want the instructions to do so in writing.
Indeed. As a silly example, I had a Pacman clone game that ran based on CPU cycle speed. I needed to turn the in-game speed setting way down and toggle turbo off to make it slow enough to be playable.
Sad but not surprising that governments failing to fund maintenance costs are leading to service failures. Even less surprising that a conservative government is using the problem they created to privatise profits.
I'm having a hard time having sympathy for someone who was supporting anti-trans bigots, who were accusing teachers of being pedophiles, and (I suppose) attempting a coup. (Hard to take the last one seriously.)
Like... Of course this ended poorly. I'm surprised they paid any of the hydro bill from their camp, tbh.
Sentencing hasn't happened yet; 48 years is the maximum, according to the article.
Whatever the sentence is will be ridiculous since it's just copyright infringement, but hopefully the sentencing goes to a small fraction of the maximum.
I don't follow. The Internet Archive only allows 1 copy of each physical book to be loaned at a time. If someone has the book you want already, then you need to wait until their loan expires. It's not like shadow libraries that allow unrestricted DRM-free downloading.
And publishers' profits are rising and don't seem to be at all correlated to library access, so of course nobody is suggesting they should close.
That's... Hilariously bad. Canned meats vs. fresh. Fancy ice cream vs. cheap ice cream. Everywhere you look things are shittier for the Aboriginal People's food guide. What the fuck were they thinking? Why did they even put out a different version?
Vitamin D supplementation is recommended for all Canadians, not just vegans. And Omega 3, D, and B12 are common supplement recommendations (actually backed by strong evidence) for the general population. (Although the benefits of Omega 3 supplementation for heart health has come under scrutiny, I think its anti-inflammatory effects are still pretty widely supported.)
Anyway, no need for the vitriol. Nobody is forcing you to go vegan. If it works for them, then great! It's definitely better for the planet to eat less meat, so power to them. (I eat way too many eggs to ever consider going vegan, personally.)
Yeah, the new Canada's Food Guide is actually really good. (The one below is modeled after it, but changed to vegan foods).
Like, it seems like a reasonable, evidence-based, practical guide to healthy eating habits. (Unlike every single previous version going back to the 50s that might as well have been propaganda from the Canadian Wheat Board.) The latest revision is from 2019, iirc, and it's the first time I've felt comfortable using it as the basis of classroom instruction.
Yeah, fair. It's frustrating when prices fluctuate; I'm lucky that we don't have many "must have" items on our shipping lists, and I'm very price sensitive, so I just don't buy things that are expensive. And I only used to go to Superstore at most weekly, so I'd never have noticed daily fluctuations.
Beehaw never defederated with lemmy.ml. Most notably, Beehaw defederated from Lemmy.world which is one of the main reasons I'm happy to stay here. If Beehaw moves away from Lemmy, I'll definitely need to find another instance that's defederated with Lemmy.world.
To be fair to Loblaws, I've never seen them change prices with these mid-day, so they're not engaged in "surge pricing" that I've heard of. (I haven't been to Loblaws since the start of the boycott, but I don't expect it's changed.)
But I do wonder about the legality of that; right now, if the price at the till doesn't match the item price, you get the first one free and the rest at the marked price (up to $10 items; above that it's $10 off the marked price for the first item). But my impression is that policy is from Loblaws signing some sort of grocery code ages ago when scanners came in, essentially to assure consumers that they wouldn't be scammed by scanners ringing up items at higher prices than advertised. I don't think that is legally mandated.
So, then, what happens if the price changes between when you put it in your cart and when you arrive at the till? Anyone engaging in surge pricing where the timing isn't clearly marked in advance is going to get into a lot of trouble with consumer backlash, at the very least, but I hope it's illegal, too.
There's probably something in the terms about it, and it would take a very expensive legal battle to settle it. And I doubt it has enough legal merit to be taken on as a class-action lawsuit.
So, really, does it matter if it's illegal? With the asymmetrical power imbalance, they literally don't need to care about the laws. Realistically, no EU regulator is going to fine them for cancelling "a purchase made in India", either.
The biggest thing that stood out to me was the mismatch between revenue and spending at different levels of government. 90% of spending with only 50% of tax revenue for regional government compared to 10% spending with 50% for the central government. I suppose that's the mechanism they're using to centrally manage the economy, by controlling fund transfers to lower levels of government?
Including personal debt and corporate debt, this will also put China above 300% net debt to GDP. That seems really high, but I couldn't easily find equivalent values for other countries to compare against. Canada has 100% consumer debt to GDP, 107% government debt to GDP, and corporate debt of $2 trillion / $3 trillion GDP is about 67%. (And I think Canada is considered over-leveraged compared to peer countries).