theregister.com

Lucidlethargy , to Technology in Bill Gates says not to worry about AI's energy draw
@Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works avatar

Can I worry about the fact the most serious AI's are owned by large companies, and that they are being taught to replace artists, writers and creatives?

What a sad fucking dystopia we live in.

best_username_ever , to Privacy in Microsoft CEO of AI: Online content is 'freeware' for models

I agree with Microsoft for once. I get all my online content on the open web of TPB. It's freeware, if you like. It is the understanding.

AWittyUsername , to Technology in Bill Gates says not to worry about AI's energy draw

Oh Gates what a lovely altruistic human billionaire.

technocrit , to Technology in Bill Gates says not to worry about AI's energy draw

They gonna be hawking these cliff notes machines even as the last breathable air disappears.

nutsack , to Technology in FCC proposes ending cellphone carrier locks after 60 days

I had no idea this was even still a thing I don't understand how it's legal

Psythik ,

It's not; literally no carrier forces you into a shitty contract anymore.

EncryptKeeper ,

It is very much still a thing and the contracts still exist in some form, specifically phone financing and locking. If you finance a cellphone from Tmobile, it will be locked to Tmobile until you’ve paid for the phone in full, which is usually over two years of payments. This is why carriers offer deals on phones purchased through them, and have those upgrade-every-year type plans. The contract has just switched from the phone service, to the phone itself. This is also why if you walk into any carrier’s store, they’ll try and convince you to trade in your perfectly good paid-for device for the next years model with a decent trade in value, but only if you finance the new phone.

OnToTheFuture ,

Boost mobile doesn't even do financing, but they require you be with them for a year before they'll unlock your phone. I refuse to go back to them after buying an LG Stylo, and then when I wanted to switch 6 months later they refused to release the phone. I ended up having to buy a whole new phone when I didn't have the money to do so.

JasonDJ ,

Not like they used to, mostly. They just replaced "contract" with "equipment payment plan". Because $50/mo for 24 months is easier for a consumer to swallow than a lump payment of $1200, especially when the carrier is giving you a $10 or $20 (or more) "discount" on the phone.

But as long as the EPP is active, the phone is locked to that carrier. And I think that's fair. No different than the bank holding the title while you finance a car.

The thing is that the plans that have these equipment deals are significantly more expensive than others. Namely big name plans like TMo or Verizon, compared to MVNO plans like Mint or Visible. So you end up paying more for the plan because you get "a deal" on your phone (but still end up ultimately paying more).

Zanz ,

It is illegal for all carriers using gsm-based communication. So that's everyone at the moment and that means that you can't have phones locked when they're purchased. They can lock the phones they're under contracts if you finance the phone. Then they don't have to remove that until the phone is completely paid off. What's been going on over the last 4 or 5 years is the company will give you a subsidy for the phone even if you pay it off in full and then claim that that subsidy is part of a financing deal. So they'll put a fake price and be like the phone cost $1,200 but we'll sell it to you for $800. Then when you pay off the 800 right when you walk out the door you're still getting a subsidy that directly pays for that extra $400 they gave you off that wasn't part of the actual price. If you ever go to change service they automatically use the rest of that monthly subsidy immediately to pay off the phone keep that on the phone since the cost is the same as the subsidy for each month you have the phone untill it's paid off.

If you have Verizon they have been blocking phones even if they're not allowed to do that claiming that any phone not purchased through them or the model number that they sell in the store is not compatible with their Network and needs to be evaluated for security. Then they make it a pain in the ass to get your phone approved to be on their Network and it can take up to 90 days even if it's the same phone just the "unlocked" version with a different model number. This was less of an issue when the FCC rules for GSM based carriers were being enforced, but under Trump and Bush they were not enforcing the rules. And until LTE we had two carriers that were not using GSM based technology so they were not covered by the rules.

rickyrigatoni , to Technology in Bill Gates says not to worry about AI's energy draw
@rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee avatar

Ricky says Bill Gates needs to shut the fuck up. You have thousands of times more money than any human will ever need leave the rest of us alone you fucking demon.

gravitas_deficiency , to Technology in FCC proposes ending cellphone carrier locks after 60 days

Too bad SCOTUS just ruled that US government regulatory agencies are essentially meaningless a day or two ago

reagansrottencorpse , to Technology in Microsoft CEO of AI: Online content is 'freeware' for models • The Register

I wish Microsoft had anything worth taking for free

renard_roux ,

Games?

barsoap , to Technology in FCC proposes ending cellphone carrier locks after 60 days

Simlocks have completely vanished from the market at least here in Germany, mostly because carriers don't care if you use your subsidised bonus phone with a different card -- you're still locked into a contract with two years or such minimum duration. Even those contracts have gotten rare though I think most people right-out own their phones and then make a separate contract.

vxx ,

It only went away because they were forced to. We would still live with that carrier mess if it wasn't for regulation.

TheTimeKnife , to Technology in FCC proposes ending cellphone carrier locks after 60 days
@TheTimeKnife@lemmy.world avatar

About damn time.

rottingleaf , to Technology in Bill Gates says not to worry about AI's energy draw

Another attempt to approach king Midas' powers by turning matter into shit, because apparently if we can turn it into shit, then eventually we'll learn to turn it into gold.

It's amazingly stupid. Among other things because it's been described by Lem in either "Summa Technologiae" or "Megabit Bomb", I don't remember which. Possibly both.

But one doesn't have to read Lem for the concept of entropy.

It just feels so boring. People with power showing with all their herd that they don't deserve that power, because they don't understand simple concepts.

Blackmist , to Technology in Bill Gates says not to worry about AI's energy draw

As he counts his money.

Zangoose ,

If he was counting his money in $100 bills it would still take him about 40 years,

Edit: assuming he counts 1 $100 bill per second

masquenox , to Technology in Bill Gates says not to worry about AI's energy draw

Of all the celebrity billionaire parasites this one is the one I hate the most. At least Elon and Bezos has the decency to show us what scumbags they are... they don't call Gates "No.1 Sugar Daddy To The PR industry" for nothing.

t3rmit3 , to Technology in Microsoft CEO of AI: Online content is 'freeware' for models • The Register

There is leaked Windows source code online... Is that also freeware for me to train an OS-building model on?

RootBeerGuy ,
@RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

Sorry, you need high quality data for training.

vrek ,

The Linux source code is also online...

smeg ,

Seems like we're all in agreement that all information should be free, I look forward to them open-sourcing every proprietary bit of code they have

MonkderDritte , to Technology in Bill Gates says not to worry about AI's energy draw

I say shut up.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • kbinchat
  • All magazines