Right, having trouble following the logic here.
When referring to the constitution, people can (and do) refer to it in it's original state.
If you Google constitution you find the original document including photos. I could understand why someone would possibly expect all amendments. But the thing does also list "bill of rights" and for the average American that would purchase such a thing it's more than enough. I'm sure we'll see these on auction in 20 or 30 years.
What I really don't get is the anger this conversation has drawn, the title of the article tries to imply that not including all the amendments is an intentional act of sexism & racism. As if trump is hand selecting it all. We don't need a money grab bible to tell us he's sexist & racist.
How cockroaches spread around the globe to become the pest we know today ( apnews.com )
They’re six-legged, hairy home invaders that just won’t die, no matter how hard you try....
Trump's $60 Bible & Constitution omits amendments ending slavery and allowing women to vote ( meidasnews.com )
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/15442706...
How can you push agendas if you don't have one? ( lemmy.world )
Zombie Sequel '28 Years Later' Sets June 2025 Release ( www.rollingstone.com )