Maybe they do, maybe they don't. It's not clear from the video.
We'd need the IDF to justify the killings. They haven't won't and can't.
Maybe they do, maybe they don't. It's not clear from the video.
You think you can go shoot up a school, then say it was in self-defence without evidence and get away with it? How's the principle different here?
We don't. No evidence they are civilians. No evidence they are combatants. If you have proof other than "they look civilian", give us proof.
The burden isn't on those killed to prove their innocence - the killers need to do that. Rule of law - really simple stuff you seem incapable of grasping but get all pissy when I point that out.
It is not. No proof this is Gaza. No proof it's an IDF drone strike. No proof that it happened last week, last month, last year or last decade. If you have proof "IDK it looks like it", give us proof. And not just one of these things, but ALL.
...except the IDF admitting it was them. I know they have zero credibility, but when they admit to this kind of thing, I think it's reasonable to believe them.
Nobody said IDF don't have proof. They just don't have to share it with the public, no matter how hard you want it. I'm not defending them, I'm trying to show you that your logic is flawed, and you can easily be swayed by misinformation and propaganda.
Absent anything at all suggesting they were combatants in the context of a genocide Israel is committing? I've got a bridge to sell you.
What I believe is my deduction from actual, confirmed, reputable sources. Not a random twitter video. My opinion that is a genocide is just that - opinion. And unlike you, I don't claim I have proof. Because none of us have.
Again, the IDF admitted to the killings. You saw video of a bunch of people being killed for no discernible reason, and you're defending that.
And the rest? You can stop reaching - it's not doing you any favours.