@hauschke@mastodon.social cover
@hauschke@mastodon.social avatar

hauschke

@[email protected]

ꘐ

#OpenScience, #Metadata, #Libraries, #ResearchInformation, #OpenResearchInformation, #ScholComm, #Wisskomm #Stuff

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

gedankenstuecke , to AcademicChatter group
@gedankenstuecke@scholar.social avatar

Got this email earlier and I’m still upset about it. Some unnamed “team from , & ” fed our preprint through their “" to generate "suggestions" on how we could improve it.

This feels like some really shit study that seems to think asking for consent is optional. And like one that wants to spin out into an even shittier start-up in the future (hence not giving any names of team members)?

@academicchatter @hci

Screenshot of an email, reads: Hi there, Congratulations on your recent preprint on arXiv, titled "Co-Designing a wiki-based community knowledge management system for personal science". We are grateful for your hard work and dedication to the field, and we value your contributions! We are part of a team from Northwestern University, Stanford University, and Cornell University, committed to providing research feedback to scholars with the assistance of advance AI models. We have followed your work closely and, upon a thorough examination, generate the suggestions below. These suggestions cover various aspects of your work, including the writing style, research design, and title. We hope they offer you fresh insights that may enhance the depth and impact of your research. To view detailed comments regarding your research, please visit this link: http://feedback.kellogg.northwestern.edu/redacted Once again, congratulations on your achievement. We are certain that your work will have an impact on the future of your field and will inspire fellow researchers worldwide. Should you have any questions, concerns, or suggestions, please do not hesitate to reach out to us at redacted_address@outlook.com. Your insights would be invaluable in helping us better support the community's research development.
ALT
  • Reply
  • Expand (13)
  • Collapse (13)
    • hauschke ,
    @hauschke@mastodon.social avatar

    @gedankenstuecke @academicchatter @hci

    I got this today, too, for a preprint with @serhii . I didn't click on it. The whole mail screams "scam".

    I mean, we wrote the paper. If we want a LLM review, we would have done so before submission, right?

    hauschke , to AcademicChatter group
    @hauschke@mastodon.social avatar

    I am currently revisiting the "Openness Profile" by Knowledge Unlatched.

    This quote points to a bigger systemic problem in the academic world than some might realise. These collegial care activities are a) extremely important for science as a social system, not least for the integration of new minds into the community and b) they prevent people from working on papers and grants with the same effort as those (men) who avoid them.

    Source: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4581490

    @academicchatter

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • kbinchat
  • All magazines
    •