@eager_eagle@lemmy.world cover
@eager_eagle@lemmy.world avatar

eager_eagle

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

eager_eagle , (edited )
@eager_eagle@lemmy.world avatar

exactly, they (Telegram) don't need to put sketchy code in the clients when most messages are not E2E encrypted and they control the servers lol

eager_eagle , (edited )
@eager_eagle@lemmy.world avatar

Telegram is the only massively popular messaging service that allows everyone to make sure that all of its apps indeed use the same open source code that is published on Github.

Not true. Signal has a very similar client verification process to Telegram's, described here. The lack of an iOS reproducible build is an Apple limitation / nuisance.

It’s very complicated, the 2nd jailbroken device is necessary because there’s no other way to download the .ipa, but even if you manage to do that and bit-for-bit reproduce the .ipa you downloaded from source, there’s no way to know if the App Store is sending every user the same .ipa or if your other, non-jailbroken iPhone downloaded a backdoored one.

Telegram docs even acknowledge these limitations.

Ultimately, this client verification is not the selling point Telegram's founder makes it sound like, since most messages are not E2EE and the server code is closed.

eager_eagle ,
@eager_eagle@lemmy.world avatar

I'd look into AV1 decoding benchmarks, regardless of NVIDIA vs AMD, as I've been using NVIDIA on Jellyfin for a while with no issues.

HEVC is not as relevant IMO, as it's not available through browsers due to license restrictions (ffmpeg / mpv works fine), so I'd focus on AV1 capabilities, which is not available in many cards.

eager_eagle ,
@eager_eagle@lemmy.world avatar

Btrfs is slower than ext4, xfs, and f2fs in pretty much every metric. Noticeably slower app opening times is the reason I switched to F2FS for good.

eager_eagle ,
@eager_eagle@lemmy.world avatar

Compression might be useful in some cases, but the bulk of my data is already compressed or not much compressible (think videos, images, compressed archives, game assets). So the trade off doesn't make much sense to me.

If You Hate Density, Maybe Don’t Live in A City (Oh the Urbanity!) ( www.youtube.com )

When you argue for housing reform to legalize denser development in our cities, you quickly learn that some people hate density. Like, really hate density, with visceral disgust and contempt for any development pattern that involves buildings being tall or close together.

eager_eagle ,
@eager_eagle@lemmy.world avatar

we can no longer afford to live like humans but rather like animals in stacked compartmental cages

lol the drama of someone who has never lived in a nice apartment

eager_eagle ,
@eager_eagle@lemmy.world avatar

Aren't these sizes a marketing gimmick anyway? They used to mean the gate size of a transistor, but I don't think that's been the case for a few years now.

eager_eagle ,
@eager_eagle@lemmy.world avatar

Later each new generation process became known as a technology node[17] or process node,[18][19] designated by the process' minimum feature size in nanometers (or historically micrometers) of the process's transistor gate length, such as the "90 nm process". However, this has not been the case since 1994,[20] and the number of nanometers used to name process nodes (see the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors) has become more of a marketing term that has no standardized relation with functional feature sizes or with transistor density (number of transistors per unit area).[21]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiconductor_device_fabrication#Feature_size

personally, I don't care they try to simplify these extremely complicated chip layouts, but keep calling it X nanometers when there's nothing of that feature size is just plain misleading.

eager_eagle ,
@eager_eagle@lemmy.world avatar

sigh

The news:

So, in conclusion: If your face is large, you’re a conservative; if it’s skinny, you’re a liberal; and facial recognition is bad—we all know that. That seems to be all you need to know.

The paper:

Our results, suggesting that stable facial features convey a substantial amount of the signal, imply that individuals have less control over their privacy. The algorithm studied here, with a prediction accuracy of r = .22, does not allow conclusively determining one’s political views, in the same way as job interviews, with a predictive accuracy of r = .20, cannot conclusively determine future job performance.

r=0.22 is a weak to moderate correlation, btw. An actual predictor will need more data than just one's face in order to have a decent chance.

eager_eagle ,
@eager_eagle@lemmy.world avatar

xfinity will advertise 100 Tbps lines with the abysmal 1.5 TB/mo data cap anyway

"you can drive this super sport car for $ per month - but only for 10 miles"

eager_eagle ,
@eager_eagle@lemmy.world avatar

is there any Google product that is not getting worse though?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • kbinchat
  • All magazines