thegreybeardofthetree , to Linux
@thegreybeardofthetree@fosstodon.org avatar

@linux Sharing a 'small' inconvenience I had to fix with (I suspect is the same) - I couldn't launch snaps (spotify, bitwarden) after update - error was: cannot determine seccomp compiler version in generateSystemKey fork/exec /usr/lib/snapd/snap-seccomp: no such file or directory

The fix (I first tried re-installing, didn't work) was to:
a. locate snap-seccomp - was in /usr/libexec/snapd
b. symlink: ln -s /usr/libexec/snapd /usr/lib/snapd

thegreybeardofthetree OP ,
@thegreybeardofthetree@fosstodon.org avatar

@pastermil @linux the attack surface for something that isn't officially maintained by the developers, and that doesn't have more vetting (e.g. distribution packages) opens up room for malicious actors.

e.g. / recommends verifying scripts manually before installing, and malicious scripts have been found and removed.

There are actors like out there. An unofficial needs manual verification before install - that's why I just go with if the flatpak isn't official

pastermil ,

the attack surface for something that isn't officially maintained by the developers, and that doesn't have more vetting (e.g. distribution packages) opens up room for malicious actors.

There are actors like #jiatan out there.

Funny that Jia Tan was an official maintainer of xz until he was found to be problematic.

Speaking of verifying, you know you can't really verify anything on the snap server since they're proprietary, right? On the contrary everything on flathub is laid to bare for anyone to look at.

In the end, you're free to choose. Since you've kindly provided your argument, I've provided mine in hope you'd reconsider.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • kbinchat
  • All magazines