brsrklf ,

I am surprised the reason for blocking ads doessn't include making sites somewhat readable. I guess faster loading could be it? But generally it's more of a layout problem than a bandwidth one.

I tend to not use adblockers, or when I do it's on a black list system for worst offenders rather than by default. However, I absolutely refuse tracking, and if it's the only option I go to firefox reader mode immediately.

The usual false dichotomy of "personalised ads or you're killing us!" is not acceptable.

plz1 ,

Ad tech IS the tracking, so if you're not blocking ads, you're not actually refusing said tracking. I think you might be conflating cookies with being tracking (they are), but that's only a part of it.

MyFairJulia ,
@MyFairJulia@lemmy.world avatar

I wonder why ad tech can‘t be „Let‘s show ads that correspond to what‘s being talked about on that website.“ Kinda like what Google suggested with Topics but without following me through the internet.

gravitas_deficiency ,

Because that’s not as profitable. That’s it. That’s the reason.

HootinNHollerin ,

Some folks still raw dog the net? Wrap that shit up

FartsWithAnAccent ,
@FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io avatar

This is 100% the fault of shitty advertisers spamming us with literal scams, malware, and spyware.

pachrist ,

I get that ads pay for a free internet. But that doesn't mean that 60% of my screen needs to be malware to read a local news article.

Until advertisers act in good faith, I block as much as possible.

Zikeji ,
@Zikeji@programming.dev avatar

Or those scummy click bait ads disguised as related articles? They make my blood boil with how they prey on the vulnerable.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • [email protected]
  • kbinchat
  • All magazines
    •