“Throughout history, philosophers have tackled a number of questions, but on the side they have provided something almost as valuable - an implicit guide on how to think like some of the brightest minds in history. And that is what we shall be exploring today.”
🎥 #Video length: twenty five minutes and forty one seconds.
The new issue of Epoché is live! With writing on Bataille, Schelling, Adorno, Derrida, Benjamin, and adventures through the enlightenment. Politics, biology, literature, metaphysics and laughter. Get in it.
Here is my short take on why epistemic injustice in healthcare matters! From the launch of project EPIC: https://youtu.be/VZ02s29xKNw?si=B3WyFlaFADwX2E8c Please visit the project website to view what the other researchers had to say. @philosophy
Latest papers: Itzel Cadena-Alvear & Melina Gastelum-Vargas aim to deepen into a theoretical account on the role of behavioural settings and relational affordative space and how this perspective can be used to reconceptualise human cognition https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2024.2360132@philosophy#philosophy
Four exciting calls for papers at Philosophical Psychology right now! Get involved: the nature of devotion, causation in memory, mystical experiences and entropy, the philosophy and legacy of Daniel Dennett @philosophy
Latest papers: François Recanati compares their account of IEM to the simple view and argues that their account complements the simple view by answering why no identity assumption is needed to ground the singular judgment in the IEM cases https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2024.2359493@philosophy#philosophy
“In what follows, a reading of Wittgenstein’s remarks will be offered according to which Wittgenstein subscribes to a form of dialetheism (that is, the view that there are sentences that are both true and false). In contrast to modern dialetheist approaches to the Liar, however, some of Wittgenstein’s remarks suggest combining a dialetheist position with what is called ‘logical nihilism’ (that is, the view that there are no universally valid inference rules).”
The “School of Salamanca,” founded by Francisco Vitoria, and the commentators of Coimbra are at the center of a movement sometimes called the “Second Scholastic.”