magic_lobster_party

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

magic_lobster_party ,

Why spend 15 minutes to get the answer when it can be explained in a few paragraphs?

magic_lobster_party ,

A more proper title would be “study finds 268% higher failure rates for poorly planned software projects”.

“Agile” as a word is mostly an excuse of poor planners for their poor planning skills.

magic_lobster_party , (edited )

It’s a bit hit and miss. Some parts are glorious. Other parts are just frustrating.

There’s too many parts that are “Oh you failed this jump? Now you need to start all over again”. I’m thinking especially on that Yoshi mission in Ricco Harbor.

Or that lilly pad bonus level on that island that you must bring Yoshi to, but Yoshi can’t swim so you need to ride those slow ass boats. Ensure you don’t miss any jump, because then you need to start all over again.

The visuals are incredible for its time. The water is one of the most beautiful on that generation.

It’s a game that could’ve benefited from being easier, or at least be more forgiving. I just want to soak in all the visuals.

New FPS Built Using Doom Tech Is Better Than Most AAA Shooters ( kotaku.com )

Things aren’t looking good for me. I’m a few levels into Selaco, a new FPS out now on Steam, and I’m stuck behind a bar as a group of sci-fi soldiers unload their rifles and shotguns into my hiding spot. I’m also low on health. So yeah, a bad spot to be in. I take a deep breath and try something....

magic_lobster_party ,

I’m not the same person, but I’ve played a few levels now. I think it’s really good, especially for being early access. Reminds me of original Half Life, so if you like that kind of game it’s a strong recommend!

magic_lobster_party , (edited )

TL;DR:

In Python, following returns False.

9007199254740993 == 9007199254740993.0

The floating point number 9007199254740993.0 is internally represented in memory as 9007199254740992.0 (due to how floating point works).

Python has special logic for comparing int with floats. Here it will try to compare the int 9007199254740993 with the float 9007199254740992.0. Python sees that the integer parts are different, so it will stop there and return False.

magic_lobster_party ,

It’s both. As you said it’s because of loss of floating point precision, but it’s also with some of the quirks how Python compares int with float. These two together causes this strange behavior.

magic_lobster_party ,

A property can have the wrong indentation and it would still be a syntactically correct yaml. It’s hard to distinguish whether a line is wrongly indented or not. Copy and paste a line and mistakenly use the wrong indentation, and the entire production breaks.

In json it’s much harder to do similar mistakes.

magic_lobster_party ,

It’s quite often I have to second guess whether the code is correctly intended or not. Is this line supposed to be part of this if block or should I remove that extra indentation? It’s not always entirely obvious. Extra troublesome during refactors.

In other languages it’s always obvious when a line is incorrectly indented.

magic_lobster_party ,

You’re reading the title too literally. “Mind” is only mentioned once in the entire article, and that’s in the title.

magic_lobster_party ,

I would imagine a similar result. Like how the word “cartoon” activates one particular feature. And if you identify this feature you can control the level of “cartooniness” by tweaking the particular feature.

magic_lobster_party ,

No one is investing in regular currencies. You’re supposed to use it to buy stuff.

magic_lobster_party ,

Not sure how that can implemented, but I’m sure it will only lead to great amounts of SEO abuse. It only works if everybody are acting in good faith.

magic_lobster_party ,

Then it’s just more easily abused by SEO. “Best” according to who? Votes? Number of views? Page rank? All numbers can be manipulated.

magic_lobster_party ,

The article is about using computers to discover new conjectures (mathematical statements that are not yet known to be true or false). The conjecture can be then later be formally proven (or disproven) by humans.

Sounds like a good match for me. Formulating conjectures is about finding an interesting pattern and argue that this pattern holds true. Computers are getting increasingly better at pattern matching, so why not use them?

Title is a bit clickbaity by calling it AI.

magic_lobster_party ,

Olives are amazing. I can buy a jar of it and eat it all in one go.

What is a good eli5 analogy for GenAI not "knowing" what they say?

I have many conversations with people about Large Language Models like ChatGPT and Copilot. The idea that "it makes convincing sentences, but it doesn't know what it's talking about" is a difficult concept to convey or wrap your head around. Because the sentences are so convincing....

magic_lobster_party ,

I’m also among those 10,000! Good day to be alive.

magic_lobster_party ,

So far the main issues are all the changes needed for 64-bit time_t to fix the y2k38 problem

World catastrophe is getting averted!

magic_lobster_party ,

RTS games demand so much time and patience from the player to learn. What’s the proper build order? What’s the best unit composition? How many workers should get allocated for each resource? These things aren’t always obvious. And you don’t have time to read all descriptions because the time is ticking.

Not to mention good APM and battle tactics.

Shooters are much easier to understand: aim and shoot. You don’t need to follow YouTube guides to understand that.

magic_lobster_party ,

My point is that there’s usually an easier level of entry for other types of games. You aim and shoot, and you get instant feedback if you succeeded or not. You don’t need to understand advanced meta to get this, although it can help.

For many RTS games it can all be dependent on how fast you expanded your economy, not on how you play your units. You can fail the entire game because of bad gameplay early.

magic_lobster_party ,

I’m pretty sure they keep the revision history, so there’s no point in it

magic_lobster_party ,

What options are there to use instead? I think they’re still often having the best results, and are usually near the top.

magic_lobster_party ,

And search engines are unable to index the questions and answers, so good luck finding the already answered question.

magic_lobster_party ,

On the contrary, it made it far more difficult to understand the program since you had to know which method was called in which object due to polymorphism when you looked at the code. You had to jump around like crazy to see what code was actually running.

I agree with this point, but polymorphism is often the better alternative.

Using switch statements for the same thing still have the problem that you need to jump around like crazy just to find where the variable was once set. It also tends to make the code more bloated.

Same with using function references, except this time it can be any function in the entire program.

The solution is to only use polymorphism when it’s absolutely needed. In my experience, those cases are actually quite rare. You don’t need to use it everywhere.

magic_lobster_party ,

Often a simple solution is the most maintainable solution. In my experience, the code that’s most difficult to maintain are often made by devs who tried to plan ahead. The code turns over engineered to allow for stuff that never materialized.

magic_lobster_party ,

Social engineering is one of the most underestimated attack vectors. It doesn’t matter how cryptographically secure your system is if you can just ask for access.

EA wants to place in-game ads in its full-price AAA games, again ( www.techspot.com )

EA has tried this before, with predictable results. In 2020, EA Sports UFC 4 included full-screen ads for the Amazon Prime series The Boys that would appear during 'Replay' moments. These were absent from the game when it launched, with EA introducing the ads about a month later, thereby preventing them from being highlighted in...

Why are neurotypicals in charge of making up the social rules? They're not even very good at it.

Edit: A few people have interpreted the title as serious, so I wanna clarify that it was meant as a sarcastic joke about how little sense the neurotypical world makes to me, but it is still legitimately me asking for help understanding said neurotypical world....

magic_lobster_party ,

K can give the impression that you don’t care and don’t want to be bothered with it. The effort in your response is expected to be proportional to the effort it took to write the message to you.

If someone write a long personal message to you, and all you responds is K, then it gives the impression that you might not even read the message. Why even bother next time?

Proper grammar in informal settings is a difficult one, but this is my theory:

It might give the impression of mismatch in vibes. There’s a difference in informal speak and formal speak, and participants in a conversation are expected to be in the same wavelength. An extreme example, but it’s like when everybody is dressed casually at a social gathering, but you decide to show up in a three piece suit.

magic_lobster_party ,

The video is more about the diminishing returns when it comes to increasing size of training set. It’s following a logarithmic curve. At some point, just “adding more data” won’t do much because the cost will be too high compared to the gain in accuracy.

magic_lobster_party ,

Improvements are made all the time. You can’t feed a very large SVM the same data as transformer networks and expect it to perform the same. Transformers are used because they can more easily learn complicated patterns with less data.

I think I’ve read somewhere that neural networks with only one hidden layer can theoretically predict anything (if the hidden layer is large enough), but an incredible amount of data is required for it to do so, so it’s not practical.

Over time other models will be discovered that can make better use of the training data.

magic_lobster_party ,

Cute how people believe deleting answers helps. Answers are still probably stored on SO’s servers and can be used for training.

magic_lobster_party ,

DDG has been around for quite a while. Now it was a few years ago I used it last time, but the reason I switched back to Google was because I was clearly less productive with DDG.

magic_lobster_party ,

Then you’ll be rejected for being too boring

magic_lobster_party ,

Not to be overly pessimistic, but paying for dating apps doesn’t do much. Maybe you get a slight advantage, but don’t expect a huge difference.

The point about these dating apps is to make you desperate enough to pay. But once you pay they don’t want you to find someone and be done with it. No, they want to keep you in the app as long as possible, especially when you’ve proven you’re willing to pay.

magic_lobster_party ,

At least with job applications they tell you they want someone with 5 years Java experience. In dating no one tell you what they want.

magic_lobster_party ,

1 dead whistleblower is a tragedy. 10 dead whistleblowers are a statistic.

magic_lobster_party ,

It’s probably only because it’s co-designed by Teenage Engineering. Usually their devices get quite the fuzz.

magic_lobster_party ,

I guess the CTO saw you as a threat to his position.

magic_lobster_party ,

What is it you struggle most with? The type of questions? The time pressure? Anxiety?

magic_lobster_party ,

Yeah, those kind of questions are silly and don’t reflect problems that happen in real life.

My advice when you get a question similar to this is to have a pen and paper at hand. Draw a few easy examples and find a solve those systematically by hand. From there you go to harder and harder examples and adapt your system for those examples. Try to find examples where your system fails.

Once you’re confident you’ve found all corner cases you can start to write down the algorithm.

That’s the advice I can give. Hope it helps!

magic_lobster_party ,

When I think about it, what I just wrote is basically test driven development, but by hand on a piece of paper.

magic_lobster_party ,

I’m not going to commit suicide because of YouTube premium

magic_lobster_party ,

They want people to pay for premium. That’s why they’re pushing more ads. To make the free plan insufferable.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • kbinchat
  • All magazines