TaterTurnipTulip

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

TaterTurnipTulip ,

Helping generate less carbon at some point in the future does not help with the fact that we are racking up the carbon bill now. What these companies are doing is entirely unnecessary, gimmicky, and will lead to even worse climate change outcomes. Between AI, crypto, and the O&G companies we just keep pressing the gas even harder on serious, irreversible climate change.

I hope this AI push fails spectacularly at some point, but the damage is already being done.

TaterTurnipTulip ,

I'm not about to say people can't have kids, but they should really do their best to truly understand the future that awaits those kids. That temperature line is going to keep going up (except in certain areas when the AMOC collapses). Things will be worse and no one is coming to save us. Deciding to bring a new life into that future is a serious ethical and moral choice.

TaterTurnipTulip ,

Isaac Asimov was wrong. The only real law for robots/AI will be to not jeopardize the company's profits.

TaterTurnipTulip ,

Sure, and I'm not calling it the end times. But things will continue to get worse as carbon accumulates and causes temperatures to rise.

Having a child has and always will be a moral and ethical choice (for those who have a choice) and it should not be taken lightly. But there are different stakes now than before. And we still haven't gotten rid of the looming shadow of nuclear annihilation, we've only added to the ways we can destroy ourselves.

TaterTurnipTulip ,

What is a pension? /s

But also, no. No one should be forced to endure this world just to keep pensions going.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • kbinchat
  • All magazines