SamuelRJankis

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

SamuelRJankis ,

It's even more amazing that people will toss a lit cigarette butt in the middle of droughts.

Like I almost get why someone is so lazy they don't care if things look or smell bad but casual arson is a hell of a leap.

SamuelRJankis ,

The title of the article seems to insinuate some type of charity on the landlord's part but it seems like it's very clearly just business a transaction.

He said he was approached by several housing agencies asking if he would be willing to rent units to their clients and because of the promise of guaranteed rent and access to the city's landlord damage fund, he agreed.

"When the agencies came to me and said the rents are guaranteed, that was a big selling point," Dagenais said.

SamuelRJankis ,

That would require a level of political leadership not seen in many decades. Would also help if people voted better.

SamuelRJankis ,

That because they aren't primarily meant for people who buy them to live in, they're just suppose to be flipped after a few years by investors or rented out.

Half of BC's New Condos Apartments Are Investor Owned

SamuelRJankis ,

I thought that person was just the run of the mill social media idiot until I saw her name on an anti abortion list.

Crazy politics has gotten so bad in Canada people will vote to pay this person 210k a year.

SamuelRJankis ,

This is the source of the data for the title of the article, it should answer a lot of the speculative comments in this post.

Table 14-10-0063-01 Employee wages by industry, monthly, unadjusted for seasonality

Also people are significantly associating hourly wage with total annual income much more than it needs to be.

SamuelRJankis ,

I wish people just come out and say what they want instead making these long ass allegorical speeches. The guy wants subsidies.

Lütke compared the increase in capital gains taxes to levies on cigarettes to illustrate how governments typically put a higher price on activities that it wants to discourage. “To tax innovation, you’ll see the same thing,” he warned.

SamuelRJankis ,

Just going to point out the source website is pretty questionable. Also a quick google search doesn't seem to yield much results.

SamuelRJankis ,

As someone who looks at a lot of data and charts I don't remember seeing any charts where Canada isn't gotten noticeably worse compared other G7 countries.

I actually find it hard to believe people don't think Trudeau's leadership has been a very significant problem for this country. It's just laughable that anyone thinks Pierre is better.

SamuelRJankis ,

I'm probably voting for NDP whenever they decide to call a election. I don't think Jagmeet is going to be a good PM but if he can deliver voting reform that's a lot more than I'd expect from anyone else.

SamuelRJankis ,

Given that the Liberals had majority at that point I think that instance is on them.

SamuelRJankis ,

They didn’t have a majority on the ER committee. So should they have unilaterally ignored the majority report of the other parties and just ram through their own preference for STV?

They had majority in the House. They chose how the committee was constructed.

I'm really amazed how the people with 44 seats is suppose more responsible for something than the people that had 184 seats.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_House_of_Commons_Special_Committee_on_Electoral_Reform#Establishment

The initial proposed structure of the Special Committee was three voting members allocated based on each official party's seats in the House (six Liberal members, three Conservative members, and one New Democratic member), with a member of the Bloc Québécois and Green Party leader Elizabeth May given additional non-voting seats.[6]

The structure of the Special Committee was criticized by the opposition party leaders, as the government would have possessed a majority of the committee seats and could unilaterally recommend alterations to the electoral system without the support of any other party. Interim Conservative leader Rona Ambrose, the Leader of the Official Opposition, denounced the plan as "stacking the deck", while Nathan Cullen, the NDP critic for Democratic Institutions, urged the government to reconsider this plan as well. The Green Party and Bloc Québécois additionally objected to their lack of voting representation on the committee.[7]

On June 2, 2016, Monsef announced that the government would support a motion by Cullen to alter the structure of the committee to have seats allocated based on percentage of the nationwide popular vote in the 2015 election and give the Bloc Québécois and Greens one voting seat each on the committee.[8][9] The Liberal caucus on the committee would have in effect only four voting members, as the chair would not vote unless there was a tie.[10]

 

Further references.

2015 Election results:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_Canadian_federal_election

Timeline:
https://globalnews.ca/news/3102270/justin-trudeau-liberals-electoral-reform-changing-promises/

SamuelRJankis ,

While I agree with the sentiment I don't think being a public service should exclude them from being scrutinized.

The corporation cites declining revenue from delivery of letter mail and parcels, despite an increase in the volume of packages the company is delivering.

Letter mail has been declining since it peaked in 2006. Canada Post delivered less than 2.2 billion letters in 2023.

The cost of delivering mail and parcels is increasing, the company said. Canada Post has struggled to compete post-pandemic with the rising number of new, privately owned delivery companies that use what it calls a "low-cost labour" business model.

I think it was more controversial in 2014, but at a near 2 decade decline of letter mail volume thinking about reducing door to door letter services with community mailboxes seems pretty reasonable thing to at least discuss.

As far as competing with companies that are known for creating a job environment where their "contractors" have to piss in bottles. I don't think is a Canada Post issue.

SamuelRJankis ,

I'd put some good money down that this statement isn't true if anyone taking bets for it.

CNL said it's "confident that the non-compliant discharge from the sewage treatment facility does not pose a threat to the environment or the public."

SamuelRJankis ,

Just a random thing. Isn't it crazy Loblaws doesn't accept Amex.

T&T even accepts Alipay and WeChat pay.

SamuelRJankis ,

Just skipping the conversation whether he's better than the current Prime Minister I think everyone should be able to agree the Pierre is a idiot.

https://bc.ctvnews.ca/pierre-poilievre-weighs-in-on-bc-ndp-plan-to-recriminalize-public-drug-use-1.6866945

“Even nurses are having to give up on breastfeeding because they’re worried their kids will be contaminated with drugs they breathe in. What the hell they thinking over there?” said Poilievre.

SamuelRJankis ,

There's somewhat small blurb at the end stating what sectors actually saw change, but overall the article is to clearly to convey BoC should lower rates soon as it's mentioned three times in a rather short article.

For anyone who actually wants to know what changed the data is on Stat Can - https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=3610043402

SamuelRJankis ,

If anyone is wondering what this is about:

Alberta is seeking powers to veto funding agreements between the federal government and provincial entities, including postsecondary institutions.

SamuelRJankis OP ,

It's amazing how much money is made every year in real estate and how much the average Canadian is willing to draw from for affordability.

Few of us realize the extent of profit involved in the rising prices, and that’s the last thing Poilievre wants to talk about. Economist Jim Stanford notes that the real estate sector took after-tax net profit of $55.8 billion in 2022 – up 65 per cent from 2019. It remains at a historically high $48.5 billion in 2023. On top of that, construction profits are almost 50 per cent higher than pre-pandemic levels, totalling $31.2 billion in 2023. The amounts are simply staggering.

SamuelRJankis OP ,

There's a Chinese proverb: Winners are kings and losers are bandits.

I'm really not to hung up on the wording of how the money ends up in who's pockets most people think they're the good guy. I just wonder if really have to wait until things get so much worse before we can get a majority on housing affordability.

Leaked Microsoft pay guidelines reveal salary, hiring bonus, and stock award ranges by level ( www.businessinsider.com )

Leaked Microsoft pay guidelines reveal salary, hiring bonus, and stock award ranges by level::The guidelines viewed by Insider show ranges for base pay, hiring bonuses, and annual stock awards but vary by role and location.

SamuelRJankis ,

Microsoft's pay guidelines for job offers:

Level 70:

Base pay: $231,700 to $361,500

On-hire stock awards: $310,000 default to $1.2 million with approval

Annual stock award range: $0 to $945,000

Level 69:

Base pay: $202,400 to $316,000

On-hire stock awards: $235,000 default to $1.1 million with approval

Annual stock award range: $0 to $750,000

Level 68:

Base pay: $186,200 to $291,000

On-hire stock awards: $177,000 default to $1 million with approval

Annual stock award range: $0 to $490,600

Level 67:

Base pay: $171,600 to $258,200

On-hire stock awards: $168,000 default to $700,000 with approval

Annual stock award range: $0 to $336,000

Level 66:

Base pay: $157,300 to $236,300

On-hire stock awards: $75,000 default to $600,000 with approval

Annual stock award range: $0 to $160,000

Level 65:

Base pay: $144,600 to $216,600

On-hire stock awards: $36,000 default to $300,000 with approval

Annual stock award range: $0 to $90,000

Level 64:

Base pay: $125,000 to $187,700

On-hire stock awards: $24,000 default to $250,000 with approval

Annual stock award range: $0 to $60,000

Level 63:

Base pay: $113,900 to $171,500

On-hire stock awards: $17,000 default to $200,000 with approval

Annual stock award range: $0 to $44,000

Level 62:

Base pay: $103,700 to $156,400

On-hire stock awards: $11,000 default to $125,000 with approval

Annual stock award range: $0 to $32,000

Level 61:

Base pay: $92,600 to $138,100

On-hire stock awards: $6,500 default to $75,000 with approval

Annual stock award range: $0 to $24,000

Level 60:

Base pay: $83,500 to $125,000

On-hire stock awards: $4,500 default to $50,000 with approval

Annual stock award range: $0 to $16,000

Level 59:

Base pay: $74,400 to $110,800

On-hire stock awards: $3,000 default to $30,000 with approval

Annual stock award range: $0 to $12,000

Level 58:

Base pay: $70,300 to $92,600

On-hire stock awards: $2,500 default to $20,000 with approval

Annual stock award range: "By career stage"

Level 57:

Base pay: $63,800 to $83,000

On-hire stock awards: $1,500 default to $10,000 with approval

Annual stock award range: "By career stage"

Level 56:

Base pay: $60,700 to $77,900

On-hire stock awards: $1,500 default to $10,000 with approval

Annual stock award range: "By career stage"

Level 55:

Base pay: $55,200 to $71,300

On-hire stock awards: N/A

Annual stock award range: "By career stage"

Level 54:

Base pay: $51,600 to $67,000

On-hire stock awards: N/A

Annual stock award range: "By career stage"

Level 53:

Base pay: $46,600 to $59,700

On-hire stock awards: N/A

Annual stock award range: "By career stage"

Level 52:

Base pay: $42,500 to $54,600

On-hire stock awards: N/A

Annual stock award range: "By career stage"

SamuelRJankis ,

As someone who believes:

A) Housing investors collectively have made incredibly large amounts of money at cost of other Canadians.

B) Essentially every single level of government has done little to aid in housing/infrastructure developments. If not outright block them.

C) Given the other 2 issues aren't dealt with immigration is the only thing that can completely pivot overnight but we've only increased it.

I think the biggest issues is that in the last election 80% of voters seemed to think more of the same was okay. To be clear I'm talking about the people who voted for a party who's housing minister said that investor is helping the situation or the party's leader said the same or people who couldn't even be bothered to vote.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • kbinchat
  • All magazines