Imagine a bigger-than-normal bathtub, so you can sprawl-out ( arms & lega akimbo ) without hitting the sides..
the water-density is upped with brine, instead of plain water ( the float-tanks place I used to go to used sacks of "bitter salts" & the texture of the brine was damn-near oily, and DO NOT EVER shave shortly before going into a brine-soak, or you're going to discover what stinging really means )
also it is brought up to a person's body-temperature, or close to it.
When there's no temperature-difference, & you're floating sooo high that drowning is much less likely ( the Dead Sea is probably the prototype for all float-tanks, btw ), & you aren't bumping into the walls, then you're in blissful sensory-deprivation ( total dark, too, obviously, probably use a timer, limit it to 2h max ), & meditation can be awesome in these conditions.
It gives you all the fundamental-understandings, & by making you basically-competent-in-understanding sailing, it gives you significant advantage over everybody else looking at having a bit of sailing-time on someone's boat.
Authors to know of include:
Tom Cunliffe ( I can automatically recommend anything instructional of his, & he has a youtube channel )
Nigel Calder, if you're looking to invest in a cruiser for yourself, you want to read his books.
John Kretschmer's books are excellent.
if you want to have a cheap boat of your own, then there are 2 books I recommend, the white-cover book by Dynamite Payson & the Building an Outrigger Canoe book.
Do keep in mind that in some jurisdictions, human-powered hulls do not require registration ( canoes, kayaks, rowboats, etc, ), whereas powered hulls ( including motor AND SAIL ), legally do.
Between those 2, you should have some understanding of how to get yourself afloat, affordably.
Please do not compromise safety, though: alcohol massively multiplies the death-rate on the water, so segregating alcohol from operating-aquatic-vehicles is a good thing, see?
Given the measurably-poorer-outcomes for Black patients in any hospital without Black doctors ( some research from sometime in the last few years, can't remember anything else about it ), this is perfectly rational.
TTBOMK, there are 3 things which change-the-rules, significantly.
Pimsleur. Get the Pimsleur app, get the all-languages subscription, & do 1 session per day.
Flashcards, or Anki, to get the visual imprinted into your automatic-mind, for any language you are trying to learn
Later..
Tandem, where you find a speech-learning partner, you help other people learn your languages better, other people help you learn your target-language better.
Begin with Pimsleur & with some yt videos.
( they have no Sanskrit, which is the one I want, unfortunately )
Computational-Fluid-Dynamics simulations are RAM-limited, iirc.
I'm presuming many AI models are, too, since some of them require stupendous amounts of RAM, which no non-server machine would have.
"diminishing returns" is what Intel's "beloved" Celeron garbage was pushing.
When I ran Memtest86+ ( or the other version, don't remember ), & saw how insanely slow RAM was, compared with L2 or L3 cache, & then discovered how incredible the machine-upgrade going from SATA to NVMe was..
Get the fastest NVMe & RAM you can: it puts your CPU where it should have been, all along, and that difference between a "normal" build vs an effective build is the misframing the whole industry has been establishing, for decades.
IF you've a high-efficiency charger, then I'd say it's probably more-efficient to use that charger.
The warmer you run your computer, the less-efficient it becomes, & the shorter the lifespan of the hottest chips in it ( this effect shouldn't be significant )
e.g. increasing a CPU by 10Celsius should cut its lifespan in half.
by having more heat-generating-stuff going on in your computer, you impair the cooling of your CPU & GPU ( slightly, probably ), & that may affect your computer's time-to-failure.
I DO know, however, that humans are not institution-puppets without any internal-motivations.
IF they did do so, THEN that doesn't mean Al Jazeera was in any way complicit.
Apparently there's some problem at The Washington Post, now, with the guy in charge of the news-room having participated in a crime, & now is ejecting people who have journalistic-standards..
Does that mean they all are guilty of what he did?
How could it?
We're in an age where considered-reasoning is being displaced by dogwhistle ideology/prejudice, & it's required for humankind's survival, that we get competent in journalism's methodical & careful discernment.