MystikIncarnate

@[email protected]

Some IT guy, IDK.

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

MystikIncarnate ,

For anything times 5, I just take the other number, half it, and then multiply by 10. Voila. Times 5.

MystikIncarnate ,

I have my own hotdog toaster, tyvm.

I will thank you not to discuss it.

MystikIncarnate ,

I have none of these things.

The convenience closes at 11:59.

I guess I'll starve until morning.

MystikIncarnate ,

I don't think I've met anyone who would attend pride that would have any issue with him getting engaged to this girl.

They'd probably cheer.

Pride isn't about gays as much as people think, yes, a lot of the LGBTQ+ folks show up with their gender and sexual preferences basically hanging out in the open for all to see, and that's the point. Everyone I've talked to is all about being proud of who you are. Straight, gay, bi, lesbian, trans, queer, whatever. Be you. Pride is more about being who you are without prejudice, not some anti straight LGBTQ+ rave.

This guy could have proposed in the middle of the main stage at pride and gotten cheers from people.

Sir, your proposal didn't defeat shit. Good luck in your future.

MystikIncarnate ,

I feel like that's what I was trying to say.

To simplify, to be at pride, you need two things: a pride in who you are and who you love, and an acceptance of others, who they are and who they love.

In that, the OP in OP's picture would not be unwelcome, as long as they can accept others for who they are and who they love.

MystikIncarnate ,

I agree, I always feel that pride is about being open/honest/proud of who you are and who you love, and being accepting of others, in who they are and who they love.

The specifics of who you are and who you love are not important.

Minority or not, all are welcome as long as you can accept others for who they are and who they love.

.... With the obvious exception of relationships that are illegal... I'm specifically thinking of pedos here, but I'm sure other illegal relationships would also be unwelcome, like bestiality, I guess. IDK.

MystikIncarnate ,

AI in the current state of technology will not and cannot replace understanding the system and writing logical and working code.

GenAI should be used to get a start on whatever you're doing, but shouldn't be taken beyond that.

Treat it like a psychopathic boiler plate.

MystikIncarnate ,

Americans can come to my country with few limitations (Canada), and it shouldn't be overly hard to get either dual citizenship or to become a Canadian citizen. Our immigration policies are not nearly as strict as other places and we have a gigantic, and mostly undefended border with the USA. Little more than border guards stand in the way, and as long as you're not a felon, and you have a legitimate reason to enter the country, you're welcome here.

We have universal healthcare available to all citizens.

Once here it's a matter of getting an employer who will sponsor your work visa... Then it's a pretty clear path to citizenship from there.

We're not super different from the USA. More taxes, no guns. Some other differences. But we're like... America lite.

MystikIncarnate ,

No guns is a bit of an over simplification.

You can have guns for hunting, it's regulated and there's a bunch of rules surrounding it. But nobody is openly carrying them around Walmart or anything.

MystikIncarnate ,

We paid over $700k CAD for a ~3000 sq ft home that's about 20 minute drive from a major city.

Most places are similar from what I know. A new build up the street from us is asking 1.5m CAD for something much smaller.

MystikIncarnate ,

No. I know those areas are kind of playing by their own rules. I'm located in southern Ontario, well outside of the GTA. I don't want to be any more specific because I don't want to dox myself.

I expect that for most mid sized cities/towns or rural areas nearby mid sized cities (within an hour or so), the pricing is similar. For the GTA, GVA, or even other large cities like Montreal or Ottawa, the prices are much higher

kde , to KDE
@kde@floss.social avatar

Phone Link is Microsoft's late and closed source alternative to KDE Connect. It requires you sign in to a Microsoft Account for it to work.

https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/phone-link-requirements-and-setup-cd2a1ee7-75a7-66a6-9d4e-bf22e735f9e3

This means all the transactions between your phone and your PC are monitored and sucked up by Microsoft.

@kde

MystikIncarnate ,

I'll just leave this here:

https://kdeconnect.kde.org/

MystikIncarnate ,

All I'm going to say to this is....

You people still use SMS?

I've explicitly told people not to send me text messages. The protocols are old and shit compared to other instant messengers. I'm on Google chat, telegram, signal, discord, slack, teams.... Find another app to talk to me with. I generally don't care which one, but I actively refuse to sign up for or into any Facebook/meta/Zuckerberg properties. If you use something I don't that isn't owned by the zuck, I'll probably sign up so we can keep touch, but for the love of God, not SMS.

Look, SMS was great when phones didn't have internet on them. It was a quick and easy way to send updates and chat while away from your cable/DSL/dialup (whatever you had at the time). Now that data is the primary use for a mobile phone plan, just use a more robust IM app.

I also have about six or seven phone numbers, which I give out to different groups of people for different reasons, plus a phone number on my mobile which nearly nobody knows. All my other lines (all VoIP lines) ring my cellphone number. Texting from my VoIP line is not fun, but it does work. Multimedia messages generally get lost and RCS is just encouraging the use of something that should have been killed off.

I'm partial to Telegram and signal since they mainly operate by phone numbers, but I can make "voice" and video calls over data rather than having to use my cellphone directly; which allows me to call from my computer, laptop, phone, tablet.... Literally any device that can run the program. So if my phone is lost/damaged/stolen/whatever (unavailable for any reason), I can still send messages to you and call if needed.

If everything is tied to your cellphone number, and that number becomes unavailable for any reason, well... Get fucked I guess. Your SIM stops working, your phone dies/breaks/gets stolen, your provider decides to fuck your account up or charge you a fortune for no good reason and cuts you off, your provider has a major malfunction and stops servicing clients in your area.... Literally anything goes wrong with the one system you use and all your SMS bullshit goes away. Stop. Using. SMS.

MystikIncarnate ,

It's improvement.

But you can also polish a turd, and that's also improvement. It's still a turd. Taking 1990's tech and overlaying rich text services onto it, is just polish for the same 90's tech that should have been left behind.

IMO, it's still worlds away from what you can get with a purely digital instant messaging system.

Also, it seems idiotic to me that nearly all of your communications can go up in smoke by accidentally dropping your phone into a wood chipper, and you'll be SOL until you replace it because everything is hairpinned through your cellphones SMS capability. Battery dead? Out of your providers service area? Ha ha, get fucked.

Just dumb.

MystikIncarnate ,

The banks are borderline criminally negligent because they exclusively use SMS for 2FA.

Simply, it is insufficient.

I get that they want the SMS information on file, and that's understandable, but give people another option at least, Holy hell. It gives my inner IT secops brain an aneurysm.

MystikIncarnate ,

Every OS needs drivers for every device.

The only difference is whether they're included in the OS or if you need to obtain them separately.

Back in my days of dos games, you didn't download a driver for your sound card, instead, you told the game where to find the device, and what device it was, and the drivers were built into the game.

Drivers. Drivers everywhere.

MystikIncarnate ,

My fairly modern computer, originally released in 2014 (yes, that's modern compared to a lot of the computers I own), has no sound card.

I picked up a Yamaha AG06, which has a USB connection and creates both audio inputs and audio outputs to/from my PC. I can quickly plug in my phone or a Bluetooth receiver (which my phone connects to), and get other audio into my headphones with very little trouble. I prefer it this way, and if my next PC has onboard audio, I'll probably disable it in favor of the AG06.

MystikIncarnate ,

Back in my day, there was a little speaker in the case that connected to the motherboard by a couple of wires.

It sounded terrible and we liked it, because it was better than nothing.

MystikIncarnate ,

I think the only floppy disk that I know of that I didn't use was the 7"? I think it was 7. The one that's larger than the 5.25" that was really common.

From there I've used or handled just about every type of digital storage. The 5.25" floppy disks are classic, but easily near the bottom of my list for favorites. They're down there with anything on tape (which is useful but always a hassle), and early USB drives when they used the cheapest solid state IC they could find and no matter what you did the IC was always painfully slow and there was nothing you could do about it because every manufacturer did that shit.

3.5" was rigid on the outside, floppy in the middle. Still a floppy diskette in my view.

MystikIncarnate ,

On board is easier and for any audio enthusiast, sounds like trash by comparison.

I have yet to meet an onboard audio solution that didn't give you garbage in the output. Whether it's coil whine, a low hiss or a 60hz him, there's always something.

Onboard, in my experience also distorts way earlier into the volume slider by comparison.

But yeah, onboard is much easier.

MystikIncarnate ,

Baked into the kernel or not, the drivers are there.

But Windows supports so many different and strange configurations that the generic drivers included with Windows may not work with the specific audio device you're using.

MystikIncarnate ,

I always hear interference, especially from a mouse, in onboard audio.

I'm happy you haven't had this problem, but I consider that to be an outlier in the grand scheme of things.

I'd also be willing to bet you have the problem but just haven't noticed it. Which is fine. If the issue isn't one you have noticed, and you're fine with onboard, go ham. Have fun. That's not me though.

MystikIncarnate ,

Many mainboards have moved to a small piezoelectric speaker, not dissimilar to the buzzer on an old style of digital watch (think Timex), rather than a speaker pinout for the system.

It's soldered right to the mainboard. It's different than the crap cone style system speaker.

The cone style usually was bundled with the case and was usually mismatched lowest bidder garbage.

I'm pretty sure that even very modern mainboards have a piezo style "speaker" on them, though many might forego this in favor of lights or something.

MystikIncarnate ,

Considering how many systems I've heard this on, not just my own, and how long I've been able to hear it, no. Definitely not.

Some newer boards have gotten wise to the issue and generally shield or provide an exclusion area around audio carrying circuits. Not all of them do it.

Above and beyond that, the amps used are generally crap and distort at high volume levels, so no matter how good your headphones are, the audio always sounds like hot trash at high volume levels regardless of pretty much everything else.

My AG06 costs as much as a cheap motherboard. There's no doubt that the audio hardware, designed and produced by Yamaha, a well known name in audio equipment, had been built with better components than you'll find in your average onboard audio solution, and with more attention to detail about interference sources.

Considering the AG06 is on their low end of equipment, compared to some stuff out there, it's complete trash. There are audio interfaces and headphone amps that cost 5-10x what I paid for the AG06, and some that cost more. I promise you they sound better than my dinky little audio interface/mixer.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again, if you're happy with your audio solution, cool. Use it. I'm not here to judge you for what you like. For those who hear the distortion and interference from onboard audio, they already know what I'm talking about and likely have their own audio setup which eliminates any trouble they might have with their onboard audio. As long as they're happy with theirs, cool, they should use it.

I'm happy with mine.

Please don't argue that the problem doesn't exist because your limited experience hasn't noticed it. That kind of subjective anecdotal evidence proves nothing beyond the fact that you don't have a problem with your setup.

That's cool. But don't tell me that it's not a problem just because you don't have that problem.

MystikIncarnate ,

Got a pretty bad case of food poisoning last month. Didn't really eat anything for a couple of days.

My SO had it worse. She was throwing up almost everything she ate for over a week. After about 4-5 days, I was like. I'll drive you to the emergency myself, but I can't force you to go.

She ended up waiting like three more days after that and calling her primary care physician.

She's mostly better now but it was the worst I've ever seen her.

For better or worse, she did lose a decent amount of weight during that week+ of being sick.

MystikIncarnate ,

This is why I can't work in an office. The last one I worked in, people kept waking up to chat "for a sec", when it took at least 10 minutes regardless of the inquiry.

Just as I'm starting to get myself back into my workflow.... "Hey, you got a sec?"

Sure, looks like I'm not going to get anything fucking done today, so why the fuck not. The only people I'm disappointing is the employer. I can have a chat. It's fine. Not like this will negatively affect my ongoing employment.

MystikIncarnate ,

I will say that the support I got from co-workers when I was no longer working there. I got a number of messages about how disappointed they were about losing me from the team, etc.

None of that helped me find new employment, nor did it help me move up while I was there, but I was well liked.

MystikIncarnate ,

I don't think either answer is wrong.

MystikIncarnate ,

You kids. Got off my lawn. Leave me in peace with my scour.net.

MystikIncarnate ,

I feel this, especially since I'm more into networking, but my work is more generalist.

I open my mouth about networking and people's eyes glaze over. Even very experienced senior people can't really understand what I'm talking about when it comes to some of the more intermediary networking concepts. Meanwhile I tune into a podcast that's networking focused and they're basically speaking Latin for me.

There's so much that I don't know. I get the broad strokes of things but I'm hopelessly lost on so many of the more nuanced bits of networking.

I really want to break away from generalist work and get into a network focused position, but after 10 years as a generalist in various MSP companies, most places won't take me seriously as a networker and won't even sit down for an interview.

I'm good at other stuff, damn near expert level with some things, but my passion is networks and the workplaces I've been at just don't care to help me learn any of it. My current place barely has any networking more complex than a profile based L2L VPN.... Switches are basically ignored, and VLANs are rare.

I facepalm every time I discover that the guest network is just bridged into the same subnet as the LAN. I've raised the issue a few times and never been given the green light to fix it, often because the network isn't able to be managed remotely.

MystikIncarnate ,

I prefer linkin_park_numb.mp3.com

It just hit different

MystikIncarnate ,

What, like the CCNA? Which I achieved and it expired last year, and got me nowhere?

MystikIncarnate ,

Well, I'm probably going to try to get my ccnp for kicks. I'll re-do my CCNA, then do my ccnp. By the time I go for my NA cert I'll pretty much be ready to go for the np cert.

I'll build a new resume emphasizing my network stuff, though my resume is already fairly heavily focused on networking as is, and try again.

I'm pretty happy with my job in almost every way, I know most of the things I would need to know to be successful, despite it being a more generalist position, and my co-workers are cool. Management is better than most, and the pay is more than the last two generalist positions I've worked, plus it's work from home, so I'm pretty comfortable where I am for now. The pay, despite being higher than I've gotten previously, is a pretty far cry from what I probably deserve, just way too low, under $55k USD (I'm not in the US, but the conversion puts me under 55). From what I've seen online, median salary for a systems admin, which is basically what my job mostly entails, is around $73k USD... So I'm around $20k/yr shy.

I know network admins are similar, depending on the complexity/importance of the network they administrate. I'm aware of people in networking that are making more than 100k USD a year; and right now I consider that to be where things start to cap off for networking. I'd be pretty happy with $73k USD.

MystikIncarnate ,

I have three suggestions for you.

Easy mode: find a triple radio mesh wifi system and get at least two nodes. Generally the LAN Jack on the satellite nodes will bridge to the LAN over WiFi. Just add a switch and use it normally. This will harm your overall speeds when connecting to the NAS from other wired LAN systems that are not on the same switch. I'm not sure if that's important. As long as your internet speed is less than half of your WiFi speed, you shouldn't really notice a difference.

Medium mode: buy MoCA adapters and use coax. Just be sure to get relatively new ones. They're generally all 1G minimum, but usually half duplex, so there's still sacrifice there, but MoCA is generally better than WiFi. The pinch is making sure you stop the MoCA signal from exiting your premise. You don't want to tap into someone else's MoCA network, nor have them tap into yours. There are cable filters that will accomplish this, or you can air gap the coax. I'm not sure how much control you have for the ingress/egress of your coax lines. You can yolo it and just hope for the best, but I can't recommend that.

Hard mode: do ethernet anyways. Usually in rentals, nobody can complain with holes in the walls the size you would get from nails to hand pictures, not much larger than a picture hanging nail, is a cup hook. What I did at my old place, which was a rental, was to buy large cup hooks, and put them every ~18" down the hallway, and load it with ethernet cables. I used adhesive cable runners to go down walls near doors and ran the cables under doors to get from room to room. I got lucky that two adjacent rooms shared a phone jack and I replaced the faceplate with a quad port Keystone faceplate on each side. One Keystone was wired to the phone line to keep existing functionality, the rest were connected to eachother though the wall as ethernet, and I just patched one side to the other (on one side was the core switch for my network). That was my experience, obviously your experience will be different. I used white ethernet to try to blend it in with the ceiling/walls which were off-white. In my situation, I was on DSL and used the phone jack in one of the bedrooms for my internet connection, that bedroom was used as an office and it neighbored my bedroom where I used the jack to jack connections through the wall to feed my TV and other stuff in the bedroom. The ethernet on the cup hooks went from the office to the living room where I put a second access point (first ap was on the office) and TV and other stuff. Inbetween the bedrooms and the living room was the kitchen and the wet wall was basically RF blocking, so I needed an access point on either side, so one in the office near the bedroom and bathroom, and one in the living room, provided plenty of coverage for the ~900sqft apartment we were renting. Most everything was on wired ethernet, and the WiFi was used mainly by laptops and cellphones.

I live by the philosophy of wired when you can, wireless when you have to. Mainly to save WiFi channels and bandwidth for devices that don't have an easy alternative option like mobile phones and portable computers.

I don't think you're in a bad spot OP, and any of these choices should be adequate for your needs, but that will vary depending on what speed internet you have, and how much speed you need for the LAN (to the NAS and between systems).

Good luck.

MystikIncarnate ,

IMO, powerline is going to depend on a lot of factors including what kind of power you use, which varies from country to country. Where I am in North America, we use 240v split phase, and the powerline adapters are 120v (half phase), so if one unit ends up on one side of the phase, and one ends up on the other side of the phase, you're going to have a bad time, if it links at all.... So knowing which "side" of the split phase your powerline is on becomes critical, which is not something most people know about their power situation. As a result, it's basically a crap shoot whether it will work well or not.

MystikIncarnate ,

Depending on where you live and what your power circuits look like (not the outlets, the circuits that power them), you may have a great, or very poor experience.

I'd need to know what country you live in to know more, since power wiring standards vary from country to country. In the USA and Canada (I'm in Canada and the USA is the same), we use split phase and crossing the split phase will severely hinder the ability for powerline to perform.

It's a viable option, not my favorite option, I'd recommend MoCA (coax) over powerline, but it's ultimately up to you.

MystikIncarnate ,

Hello friend.

You can get 2.5gbps MoCA now. You may want to consider upgrading.

Nice username btw

MystikIncarnate ,

It can be faster, it really depends on whether you have a clear-ish channel for the mesh, which is why I would recommend something on the higher end, hopefully with a dedicated radio for mesh, so it can be on a different channel with (hopefully) less interference.

If the mesh radio is shared with client access, or if it's on a busy channel, it may be much, much slower than some options.

MystikIncarnate ,

It definitely sounds like you have some challenges ahead. I personally prefer MoCA over wireless, simply because you can control what devices are able to be a part of the network, and reduce the overall interference from external sources and connections.

With WiFi, being half duplex, only one station can transmit at a time (with come caveats). Whether that station is a part of your network, or it is simply operating on the same frequency/channel, doesn't matter. So in high density environments, you can kind of get screwed by neighbors.

MoCA is also half duplex (at least it was the last time I checked) so having a 2.5G MoCA link, to a 1GbE connection (on the ethernet side) should provide similar, or the same experience as pure ethernet (1G full duplex)... The "extra" bandwidth on the MoCA will allow for each station to send and receive at approximately 1Gbps without stepping on eachother so much that you have degraded performance.

However, it really depends on your situation to say what should or shouldn't be setup. I don't know your bandwidth requirements, so I can't really say. The nice thing about ethernet is that it on switched networks (which is what you'll be using for gigabit), the. Ethernet kind of naturally defaults to the shortest path, unless you're doing something foolish with it (like intentionally messing with STP to push traffic in a particular direction). The issue with that is that ethernet doesn't really scale beyond a few thousand nodes. Not an issue for even a fairly large LAN, but that's the reason we don't use it for internet (wan side) traffic routing. But now I'm off topic.

Given the naturally shortest-path behavior of ethernet, of you have a switch in your office and you only really use your NAS from your office PC, you'll have a full speed experience. If nothing else needs high-speed access to the NAS, you'll be fine.

Apart from the NAS or any other LAN resources, the network should be sufficient to fully saturate your internet connection. So the average WiFi speeds should be targeted towards something faster than your internet link (again, half duplex factors in here). I don't know your internet speed so I'm not going to even guess what the numbers should be, but I personally aim for double my internet speed for maximum throughput on my WiFi as much as I can. The closer you can get to doubling your internet speed here, the better. Anything more than that will likely be wasted.

There's a ton to say about WiFi and performance optimization, but I'll leave it alone unless you ask about it further.

Good luck.

MystikIncarnate ,

I've been doing IT work for more than a decade, I was a nerd/"computer guy" well before that. I've had a focus on networking in the past 15-20 years. You learn a few things.

I try to be humble and learn what I can where I can, I know that I definitely do not know everything about it, and at the same time I try to be generous and share what I've learned when I can.

So if you have questions, just ask. I either already know, or I can at least point you in the right direction.

MystikIncarnate ,

Yep, I'm sure they do.

Realistically, does any average consumer know what's on which circuit?

Spanning the split phase will screw you up, across breakers won't be fun but shouldn't pose any serious problems, as long as it's not in different sides of the split phase.

I'm pretty sure they say this because actually explaining what will work and what won't either requires significant prior knowledge of power systems, or a couple of paragraphs of explainers before you can get a rough picture of what the hell they're driving at.

Everyone I know who has used powerline, just plug it in and see if it works. Those who were lucky, say it's great and works without issue, etc. Those who were not lucky say the opposite.

I'm just over here watching the fireworks, eating popcorn.

MystikIncarnate ,

Fun fact, a lot of ADHD meds also help with things like depression. Coincidence? I don't think so.

MystikIncarnate ,

True, there's a lot of things that dist... Is that a bluejay?

MystikIncarnate ,

I did this for a coworker not too long ago.

I think it was for Firefly....

They gave the USB drive back too. Win-win

MystikIncarnate ,

I would think that cyber ops would be more concerned with fraud, underage sexual content, sexual predators... That kind of stuff.

Usually the MPAA sues people for distributing video content, and in many places, they're not super aggressive about it.

MystikIncarnate ,

Unless the recipient literally rats you out, I don't think they'll even try to....

MystikIncarnate ,

I dunno about OP, but I am, and I have definitely prioritized tickets based on how interesting they sound.

User setup for a new hire that is already here and waiting? Meh.
Weird network problem with no apparent solution which will likely require days of investigation? Sounds good.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • kbinchat
  • All magazines