I understand context. I'm just saying you've misunderstood what I've implied. I don't doubt you believe you understood it correctly but I'm just saying you haven't.
The civil thing to do would be to apologize for implying such a thing even if you didn’t intend to.
I mean I didn't imply such a thing. I'm sorry you felt so though. I understand why you're upset.
I didn't imply anything about your daughter. I was thinking you might be a bit simple since the sink think was so hard for you but it might've been something else too, so I don't necessary think that. Not sure where I implied you are a liar, I think you implied that about me but I don't remember doing it back. Could be I forgot.
I just mentioned how what you said was lying. It was imo relevant in that discussion. For my opinions, I'm not sure which ones you mean. I hope you found them relevant but they were really just additional comments brought on by the discussion. I thought they were relevant.
Oh and no, I'm not trolling. I try to answer your questions as best I can. You are asking about this stuff and I'm always not sure of the relevance, but I hope you don't think I'm a troll just for answering.
I mean the explanation is not 100% true in the sense that it’s not the actual reason, but if she isn’t supposed to believe it then it’s not a lie in that sense, if you require intent. Not all definitions do, so it still could be a lie.
Your “original point” was that I was lying to my daughter by not coming up with unreasonable alternatives even though she clearly knew what I meant and understood what I was saying.
Sorta, I just meant that yeah you were lying because the actual reason was convenience. As for the specials example, I'm not sure it really worked (or you didn't properly work it out), since in that case the special was actually special in some form. If you meant that it wasn't actually special in any way but I was expected to know it wasn't supposed to be, it would be closer, in that it would also be lying.'
What was the omission you talked about earlier btw?
Got it. Lying by omission is not lying. You need to contact the world’s justice systems and let them know.
I'm not sure what omission you are talking about.
Okay, then what is even the point of this conversation? Are you just bored and looking for someone to be contentious with?
I just wanted to make the original point. And now I'm just replying to your messages (even though the original discussion seem to be over) because I feel like it'd be rude not to.
If they don't specify how they're special then they need to be special in any way for what they say to be true though. If they say they're special in a certain way and they aren't, then that'd be a lie.
By the way, how many children do you have?
Remember, if it’s zero, you wouldn’t want to lie like you did earlier when I asked you what you told them and you responded.
Not sure why you think I wouldn't want to lie or why you think I lied earlier.
I can picture you at a restaurant after a waiter lists the specials. “Those are made of conventional ingredients I could buy at a grocery store and cook myself, so they aren’t really special now are they? You’re lying to me!”
I thought the list specials meant it was something outside of the ordinary menu, making them special to the list. If they claim they're made of special ingredients and it's the same ingredients from the regular store you visit, then they probably are taking you for a ride tbh.
You wouldn't be too busy after quitting your job so whether or not it's a lie depends on if you had quit your job before answering. If you had quit it and didn't have anything to do at that moment then yeah it'd be a lie. If you still had your job when you answered then you wouldn't be lying.