@Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world avatar

Fried_out_Kombi

@[email protected]

embedded machine learning research engineer - georgist - urbanist - environmentalist

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

Fried_out_Kombi OP Mod ,
@Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world avatar

The problem is tons of free parking everywhere needlessly sprawls out our cities, makes people drive further, and makes actual green methods of transit (like walking, cycling, and electrified public transit) less viable.

In the long term, maintaining car dependency is fundamentally incompatible with addressing the climate crisis. Removing mandatory parking minimums is a necessary step towards ending car dependency.

Fried_out_Kombi OP Mod , (edited )
@Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world avatar
Fried_out_Kombi OP Mod ,
@Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world avatar

Exactly. I'm just trying to reframe dumb NIMBY policies like restrictive zoning and mandatory parking minimums as anti-freedom so as to try to get conservative NIMBYs to maybe be just a little less NIMBY.

Absolutely no one is seriously arguing we allow PFAS chemical plants next to kindergartens or that we remove all building safety codes. Just that restrictive zoning (and other NIMBY land use policies) is stupid, harmful, and we should get rid of it.

Fried_out_Kombi ,
@Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world avatar

The raison d'être for RISC-V is domain-specific architecture. Currently, computational demands are growing exponentially (especially with AI), but Moore's Law is ending, which means we can no longer meet our computational demands by scaling single-core speed on general-purpose CPUs. Instead, we are needing to create custom architectures for handling particular computational loads to eke out more performance. Things like NPUs, TPUs, etc.

The trouble is designing and producing these domain-specific architectures is expensive af, especially given the closed-source nature of computer hardware at the moment. And all that time, effort, and money just to produce a niche chip used for a niche application? The economics don't economic.

But with an open ISA like RISC-V, it's both possible and legal to do things like create an open-source chip design and put it on GitHub. In fact, several of those exist already. This significantly lowers the costs of designing domain-specific architectures, as you can now just fork an existing chip and make some domain-specific modifications/additions. A great example of this is PERCIVAL: Open-Source Posit RISC-V Core with Quire Capability. You could clone their repo and spin up their custom RISC-V posit chip on an FPGA today if you wanted to.

Fried_out_Kombi ,
@Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world avatar

Yeah, this is the one piece a lot of people miss: in any decently competitive market, individual firms have effectively zero power to set prices; they must instead accept the prices determined by the market.

Knowing that, the solution to that sort of corporate BS, then, is to ensure markets are competitive by busting monopolies, lowering barriers to entry, and getting money out of politics to reduce the effect of lobbying.

Fried_out_Kombi OP Mod ,
@Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world avatar

That's actually the neat thing about land value taxes; both in economic theory and observed practice, they can't be passed on to tenants.

It would absolutely be a boon for the poor if we replaced other forms of taxation (such as on sales and income) with land value taxes. Plus, land value taxes tend to make housing cheaper, which helps the poor as well.

Fried_out_Kombi OP Mod ,
@Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world avatar

Unfortunately that's only possible if your city doesn't literally ban townhouses across 90% of the urban land.

But otherwise, yes, densification is amazing and we should be doing a lot more of it, and especially abolishing those ridiculous zoning codes that make densification literally illegal.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • kbinchat
  • All magazines