cupcakezealot ,
@cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

means youtube is doing something right

yessikg ,
@yessikg@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Rare Youtube W

demizerone ,

Google is ruining themselves to suck off advertisers. Hopefully someone can fill the gap of YouTube.

TheMirkMan ,

Maybe odysse will rise

Wiz ,

PeerTube could use some love.

mojofrododojo , (edited )

yes, it's sucking off advertisers and definitely not wanting to be associated with the fucking illicit arms trade....

god damn gun nuts are such whiny babies

mctoasterson ,

PSR is an awesome channel and his music slaps. He doesn't give any instructions or links to files or anything else. He just shows completed examples he built that the community designed. YouTube needs to fuck off with the censorship. The information is all out there. They aren't protecting anybody.

Pilferjinx ,

It might quell the lifestyle image of the phenomenon. If it does, it's only a few drops in the bucket.

pyre ,

lol as if they are doing it to protect anybody.

nothing YouTube ever does, or Google for that matter, is to protect anything but their ad revenue.

mojofrododojo ,

why should they be OBLIGATED to help the gun nuts?

I thought your type all believed in freedom mate, what right do you have to tell a private corporation how to run their fucking business?

you're just upset they're blocking your fetish.

mctoasterson ,

They can do whatever they want, sure. What I will say is the moving goalposts for certain "undesirable" content is pretty ridiculous especially if you consider the history of YouTube. Several of the first partner channels and many of the oldest YT channels are gun channels. They were glad to exploit that community to build their platform, but will throw them under the bus at every turn if it can be used to virtue signal or pander to advertising partners.

Sam_Bass ,

Tough titty

rob_t_firefly ,
@rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world avatar

Good.

shortwavesurfer ,

Use peertube fools

RagingRobot ,

What's that

shortwavesurfer ,

Decentralized Youtube. Imagine lemmy but for Youtube

twei ,

He's also on odysee

BigMacHole ,

A private company restricting what videos I can see is AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION when those videos involve GUNS! SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED! NO REGULATIONS!

Shanedino ,

Haha, private company, you can't do shit about it.

iAvicenna ,
@iAvicenna@lemmy.world avatar

DIY TIK UURR GINNNNS

ooterness ,

Is this why Ian McCollum's videos are getting altered? Over the years, he's had many historical deep-dives featuring firearms from the Murphy's auction house. In recent months, he's been re-uploading those videos to cover their logo with the word "Morphy's". Even though the auctions are long over, I suppose Google counts them as promoting sales.

HexadecimalSky ,

I remember something from "forgotten weapons" where he I think he talked about having to retroactively blur the auction house because he didn't work with them anymore or a change in their policy. Not a Google one, I think.

Liz ,

He fucked himself over with some of the auction houses by trying to set up backroom deal to buy a gun outside of the auction. Understandingly they don't appreciate that sort of thing. Ian has a history of not being a great person, but he's good at hiding it from the public eye.

Linkerbaan ,
@Linkerbaan@lemmy.world avatar

Have you ever seen Hashinshin and Ian in the same room?

I'm just sayin'

Space_Racer ,
@Space_Racer@lemm.ee avatar

After the whole inrangeTV stuff I stopped watching Ian entirely.

Spitzspot ,
@Spitzspot@lemmings.world avatar

Lost profits for the gun industry.

JustZ ,

People sitting at home 3D printing guns aren't happy? Who could have guessed.

at_an_angle ,

I'm guessing most people aren't happy.

Not just in the gun community but like everyone.

CerealHunter4xcr4k ,

Projection

at_an_angle ,

And?

Holyginz ,

Your point?

jaybone ,

Some of those people might be extra unhappy.

PsychedSy ,

I mean it's not gun printers that are mad. There are places to congregate for that shit.

mojofrododojo ,

then why are all the gun nuts whining in this thread?

lol

PsychedSy ,

They're mostly not. Guntubers have given a lot of people that didn't grow up with/around firearms basic knowledge and safety info. It's a pretty sweet deal.

atrielienz , (edited )

A gun is a technological marvel of a thing. Scientifically they are really very interesting. How they work is kind of ingenious, and their history and how they have so drastically changed the course of all history is fascinating.

I don't want to say that these people probably are all in that boat. But being a gun nut who wants to shoot someone isn't the only reason to find something interesting. I feel the same way about fireworks and nuclear bombs. Looking at the work that had to be done by so many people in order to make a nuclear bomb and calculate what it would and could do? That's as cool and intriguing as a space shuttle or an oil rig drill.

3D printing is also really cool in and of itself.

Stern ,
@Stern@lemmy.world avatar

“So guys getting blown up in trenches in Ukraine by drones? Ha, totally not age-restricted,” the creator said. “ Me firing a 3D printed pink glock that I made? Age-restricted. We don’t need kids watching that. We want kids watching people getting blown up by mines. Love it. Awesome.”

Guys missing the corpo bottom line.

Gun manufacturers have gotten sued by families of school shooting victims. Youtube runs the risk of getting dragged into court because little Billy sees the 3D printed pink glock, decides that he can make that, that its time to fuck up some bullies, and then after that those bullies parents shoot lawyers in every direction (which includes Youtube, even if the odds of getting anything are minimal) like mushroom spores. That risk assessment doesn't exist for Ukraine war vids.

JustZ ,

I suspect this is exactly right.

rottingleaf ,

that its time to fuck up some bullies, and then after that those bullies parents shoot lawyers in every direction

Frankly in such a situation not such instructions, and not even Billy's parents should be held primarily responsible, but bullies' parents.

Would reduce the amount of such cases quite a lot, not even talking about more healthy childhood for every human useful for civilization (bullies usually grow into pretty average types).

mojofrododojo ,

Frankly in such a situation not such instructions, and not even Billy’s parents should be held primarily responsible, but bullies’ parents.

so if someone murdered you, by your logic they should get off if they say you were bullying them, thereby transferring the blame to your parents?

Y'all need to stop huffing gasoline.

rottingleaf ,

Yes, if you abuse someone morally and then they kill you, it's their right.

transferring the blame to your parents?

Parents answer for their underage children.

If they say

No, if I did. Which is what they'll say and what'll be proven in court of law.

mojofrododojo ,

LOLWTF

you're deranged, you know that, right?

the murderer is the murderer. now, there may be factors involved that drove the person to murder, but they don't justify the murder. And they certainly don't get to blame the MURDER VICTIM, or their parents, for murder.

but I can see you're really fixated on this logic, please, don't let the people who bully you drive you to murdering someone, even if, apparently, you've put A LOT OF THOUGHT into this entire chain of events.

No one's going to give a fuck who bullied you once you start shooting mate.

rottingleaf ,

No one’s going to give a fuck who bullied you once you start shooting mate.

Once I start shooting I wouldn't care who thinks what, no?

now, there may be factors involved that drove the person to murder, but they don’t justify the murder. And they certainly don’t get to blame the MURDER VICTIM, or their parents, for murder.

A bully is not a victim and gets what's coming to them. Same as killing in self-defense.

Anyway, the mechanism I've described improves humanity, because bullies want to bully and don't want to die, whether their victim then goes to jail or not.

A dead person or a person in jail doesn't poison the society, neither does someone who killed another in self-defense or under mental duress consciously inflicted by that person. A bully who is not dead and not in jail does poison it quite a lot.

mojofrododojo ,

A bully is not a victim and gets what’s coming to them. Same as killing in self-defense.

So like, Kyle Rittenhouse, you're just gonna open up on your perceived bullies and then expect right wing politicians to save you?

rottingleaf ,

This comment doesn't make any sense. Also would you compare a woman's self-defense against sexual assault, for example, to Kyle Rittenhouse's case?

technocrit ,

More generally "gun control" is never about controlling the cops, military, MIC, etc. There's bi-partisan support for the state maintaining its monopoly on violence.

shortwavesurfer ,

Of course the state wants to maintain its monopoly on violence. That's what states do.

mojofrododojo ,

There’s bi-partisan support for the state maintaining its monopoly on violence.

as if this is a bad thing.

oh, sorry, were you still dreaming of starting a civil war with you widdle rifles against, I DUNNO, ARMOR DIVISIONS AND AIR FORCES AND CHEMICAL BIOLOGICAL AND NUCLEAR WEAPONS?

because that seems pitifully stupid.

atrielienz ,

It is if that's how you think about it. But over time the thinking behind that has changed. Because these types of people are.in our military and they think most military members think like them. By proxy that means they'd be on the side of the "militia".

mojofrododojo ,

By proxy that means they’d be on the side of the “militia”.

Nope. Regardless of your delusions of boogaloo, those people serving in the mil TOOK A FUCKING OATH.

It probably doesn't mean shit to you, I mean, obviously, but it should matter to them. They voluntarily took an oath to defend the constitution of the US against all enemies foreign and domestic. I know, I took that oath, and no one said "oh but if you want civil war there's an exception" - because there isn't.

Traitorous fucks will happen, and they'll face the consequences.

atrielienz ,

I was in the military. I took the oath. What I'm saying is, if you don't think there are MAGAT idiots in the military (a lot of them), please understand they did a threat assessment of military members while Donald Trump was running for President the first time, and decided to make a military wide training specifically to educate us about that oath and remind us who what we took it to defend. So yes. I absolutely do know some people who are all for militia fighting the government who are still military members.

fruitycoder , (edited )

Yeah billy should be build IEDs not 3d printed guns. That'll make kids safer. /s

Honestly, why can't we put half the effort we do censoring the world into teaching kids/people the sanctity of human life. There was a time where the US was had strong pacifist culture but almost every house had gun, but I think we didn't do a good job transitioning from religious to secular values in that way.

mojofrododojo , (edited )

Yeah billy should be build IUDs not 3d printed guns.

lol what the fuck?

Inter uterine devices are implanted birth control you fucking moron.

You probably meant IED, Improvised Explosive Device, but are too simple to understand acronyms have meanings.

Honestly, why can’t we put half the effort we do censoring the world

if you put half your effort into reading and comprehension you'd probably engage all four brain cells.

atrielienz ,

They have a logical point though. On the Ukranian war videos side we know that the news has to blur certain things for public decency or safety etc.

On the 3D printing side we know that while these videos are definitely educational, the point is that such an education can be used in a very horrible way.

IUD might be how their phone's keyboard corrected, or they might have just swapped the acronyms. It's more important that you knew what he meant and I think you're dismissing it out of hand.

When the internet first became popular there was a whole thing about kids having access to the materials to make a bomb with instructions. Took some bookstores down with them. Anarchist cookbook moral panic everywhere.So yeah this has been a thing for a long time.

mojofrododojo ,

pfft, I think you're giving them way more credit than they deserve. I really want them to homebrew IUD's lol, they're gonna need them when their states outlaw abortion.

fruitycoder ,

I mean I am unironically I am for people making medicine and medical devices at home if they have no other option (the four thieves vinegar collective is the best group I know for this, with diy abortion cards being one their products).

fruitycoder ,

Lol yeah I doubt IUDs are being talked about much on the war reports. Its been a heck of a week for me, so that's my excuse for the typo.

FutileRecipe , (edited )

Yeah billy should be build IUDs not 3d printed guns

I see the /s but...The Ukraine war videos don't show how to build IEDs, though. And even if they did, who would the parents sue? Ukraine, a nation at war? As opposed to 3D printed guns show you how to make them, and you could try to sue the gun company who it belongs to. And YouTube in both cases.

we didn't do a good job transitioning from religious to secular values in that way.

A lot of religions were founded on and/or expanded by violence (Pilgrims to America, Knights Templar, Spanish Inquisition, etc), so I don't remotely think "religious to secular" is the reason.

fruitycoder ,

Oh yeah no doubt religion isn't a solid basis for morality. More so just saying that we are niehlist, new ageist, more than holding something like humanist values now.

A lot of the 3d printed gun video content is more like reviews because YouTube already censor creation content.

CosmoNova ,

Soon the only content left on Youtube will be AI generated ads for Ponzi schemes.

jaybone ,

We can only hope.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • kbinchat
  • All magazines