TheAgeOfSuperboredom ,
ALostInquirer ,

Would this require feeding it batteries like a triggerhappy machine gunner?

BeatTakeshi OP ,
@BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world avatar

And a carry pouch

TheAgeOfSuperboredom ,

Probably! According to Wikipedia you get 3-5 hours off of 6 AA batteries. Not sure how that changes with the TV tuner but battery life wasn't great.

deweydecibel ,

The antenna doesn't need power to receive the signal, unless it's boosted, but something tells me that's not the case here.

What might consume more power would be any kind of decoding that's going on.

grue ,

Absolutely! (Same as playing a regular game on a Game Gear.)

I had both an AC adapter and a 12VDC car adapter for mine. Without those (considering the sorry state of rechargeables back then), the cost of batteries would've made actually using the damn thing untenable.

NoIWontPickAName ,

Look, I tried, and failed, to come up with a joke involving bonking something on the head, but they all got too wordy.

That thing was heavy as hell, especially with all those batteries.

Davel23 ,

The Turbo Express also had a TV tuner add-on.

spookex ,

The PSP also had that type of attachment here in Japan, but it uses the 1-seg standard that IIRC was made for phones and still exists

Guntrigger ,

As most of the other comments point out, pocket TV did exist and you have exposed yourself as:

  1. Younger than the smartphone
  2. Never watched a 90's movie with a security guard in it
BeatTakeshi OP , (edited )
@BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world avatar

Both wrong

  1. 1st smartphone Galaxy Spica age 26

  2. These TV wouldn't fit in your jeans

You missed the point of my very unelaborate shower thought. I see how not being a thing could be understood as never existed. I meant a big thing like, you know, smartphones

MrFappy ,

Watch season 1 episode 8 of friends, Joey has a pocket tv to watch the football game at a funeral.

ChicoSuave ,

And that was mid 90s, 10 years before the hand tablets of today.

BeatTakeshi OP ,
@BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world avatar

(...)a big thing like, you know, smartphones

spongebue ,

Cargo shorts were in style at the time, so there's that

RampantParanoia2365 ,

I'm unsure what you think Netflix or YouTube TV are, but they are indeed on my smart phone, which goes in my pocket.

guyrocket ,
@guyrocket@kbin.social avatar

Sweet summer child. It was a thing.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Watchman

mvirts ,

Instead now we have giant smartphones mounted to the wall

DriftinGrifter ,

it even runs android

tkk13909 ,
@tkk13909@sopuli.xyz avatar

I mean they literally are, you can watch literally any tv show or movie on them so I don't see a difference.

lud ,

Sure but they aren't TVs. A TV can normally only do TV shit.

tkk13909 ,
@tkk13909@sopuli.xyz avatar

Tele-vision

Far-away sight

intensely_human ,

For when you need to see something that isn’t touching your eyeballs

DigitalDruid ,

[Thread, post or comment was deleted by the author]

  • Loading...
  • BeatTakeshi OP , (edited )
    @BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world avatar

    But it's only ever been niche. Or gimmick is probably more appropriate

    partial_accumen ,

    So really its:

    Because of primitive battery technology, ubiquitous pocket TVs were never a thing.

    brygphilomena ,

    I disagree, the watchman and clones existed into the 2000s and were tech found in several households. Ours ended up with some of the tornado kit so we could get news broadcasts in power outages and other emergencies.

    Gimmick/niche isn't an appropriate description for technology that was superceded by smartphones, even early ones.

    tehWrapper ,
    @tehWrapper@lemmy.world avatar

    I am old enough to remember portable tvs.

    bitchkat ,

    I used one as recent as the mid 2000's. There was some sporting event going on (probably women's world cup) and I wanted to watch the game while playing in Ultimate league. Streaming wasn't as prevalent as it is now and the game was on OTA channel.

    Carighan ,
    @Carighan@lemmy.world avatar

    And actual pocket TVs. Interesting to see OP think they were never a thing. Don't get me wrong, they were shit, but they did exist!

    dual_sport_dork ,
    @dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world avatar

    There absolutely were pocket TV's. As a kid, even, I owned two of them. They are now of course functionally useless because they predate the switch to digital television by a significant margin. Both of mine were Realistic brand ones, which was an in store label for Radio Shack. Color LCD displays, telescoping antenna, and they ran off of 4 AA batteries. They were about the size of an OG Gameboy or a large Walkman.

    I might even still have one in a box of tech junk somewhere. I believe the second one was a Realistic Pocketvision 27.

    You can still buy a portable digital TV. These were always a bit of a stretch for a "pocket" television, more the size of a small tablet but thicker. But they totally did, and still do, exist.

    BruceTwarzen ,

    What are you even on about? I have a screen in my pocket where i can watch quite literally every movie that exists.
    Imagine being a time traveller and someone asks you if you have any cool tech like a pocket tv.
    "Hah, no kiddo, we dont. I have that screnn with access to movies and tv shows tho."

    BorgDrone ,

    Also, my TV provider’s app allows me to watch live TV on my phone.

    Boozilla ,
    @Boozilla@lemmy.world avatar

    I think some of the folks in this thread might enjoy the Techmoan channel on YouTube. It's not about pocket TVs in particular, but he does review and restore old AV tech. It's a fun channel if you're into retro tech.

    NoIWontPickAName ,

    If we’re gonna rep tech YouTubers, I am honor bound to mention Technology Connections.

    Now, if you’ll excuse me, I’m off to buy 2 of something.

    Boozilla ,
    @Boozilla@lemmy.world avatar

    Love Technology Connections. I learned way too much about pinball machines thanks to thay guy.

    ALostInquirer ,

    if you primarily watch videos with your smartphone, couldn't you call it a pocket tv?

    https://media1.tenor.com/m/QLbV11ltA8cAAAAC/smart-thinking.gif

    BeatTakeshi OP ,
    @BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world avatar

    I know it's semantics, but if your great-gramps would time travel to today, he would ask about your pocket TV, and you would reply nah, it's a smartphone

    MxM111 ,
    @MxM111@kbin.social avatar

    Which is actually not smartphone, but a general purpose computer with cell internet connection that can be used for many things, one of those is actually calling.

    RampantParanoia2365 ,

    Or, I would reply yes, totally. It's called a smart phone, and load up the literal television app called YouTube TV

    NoIWontPickAName ,

    No, because your smartphone needs internet, tv signals reach way more places, and more reliably.

    Especially since broadcast tv, in America ya damn Limeys, is free, while internet is either very localized (WiFi, etc…) which may or may not be free, or wide spread (Cell phones, Satellites, etc…) which are definitely pay.

    BorgDrone ,

    Do they?

    I can watch my local TV channels from the other side of the planet. I don’t think the signal reaches that far.

    NoIWontPickAName ,

    With internet

    BorgDrone ,

    Your point?

    NoIWontPickAName ,

    That that is the difference to me, a tv has a built in tv tuner, otherwise it is a streaming device.

    BorgDrone ,

    So? Not sure why the difference matters. What is even the use or a tuner anymore?

    NoIWontPickAName ,

    Tuning into OTA broadcasts.

    BorgDrone ,

    Which has significantly worse picture quality than cable or fiber, has fewer channels and isn’t even significantly cheaper

    NoIWontPickAName ,

    Free is absolutely cheaper than paying anything

    BorgDrone ,

    Here you get a grand total of three shitty channels for free OTA. Anything more requires a subscription.

    NoIWontPickAName ,

    Oh no.

    Here, in the middle of nowhere, like a town with 1500 people was the biggest thing in 20 miles or so, we got about 10-15 channels without even having the antenna outside the house, plus surrounded by forest.

    BorgDrone ,

    We have more OTA channels, you just have to pay for them. The free channels are in shitty SD quality (you have to pay for HD) and they are only unencrypted because the government requires it (as they are used for emergency broadcasts).

    NoIWontPickAName ,

    That sucks

    johnlobo ,

    why would you want only pocket tv when you already got pocket everything?

    intensely_human ,

    same reason

    snooggums ,
    @snooggums@midwest.social avatar

    A smartphone is a pocket TV.

    BeatTakeshi OP , (edited )
    @BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world avatar

    How do you call yours though?

    A smartphone is ALSO a pocket TV is what you mean. It's not the other way round is what I mean.

    "The iTV 6 Pro can now make phone calls"

    Kolanaki ,
    @Kolanaki@yiffit.net avatar

    I mean... They were a thing before smartphones.

    I thought it was random as fuck when I worked at Walmart, I was asked to clean out the traps in the freezer (like a liquid channel for spills) and I found a pocket TV from the 90's stuffed in there, still in the packaging. This was only a few years ago; that thing had to have been in there for at least 2 decades.

    gregorum ,
    @gregorum@lemm.ee avatar

    Because of smartphones, they ARE a thing!

    BeatTakeshi OP ,
    @BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world avatar

    You don't call them that is what I meant

    possiblylinux127 ,
    @possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip avatar

    You mean the call meant what?

    NoIWontPickAName ,

    Only with Internet

    captain_oni ,

    Before the analog blackout, some phones had both radio and TV apps. They even came with an adjustable antennae.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • kbinchat
  • All magazines