Which link/bookmark manger do you prefer, and why?

There are so many out there, a few that I came across include:

Having a giant comparison table for this might be nice

retro ,
@retro@infosec.pub avatar

I've started using Hoarder and am enjoying it. I really like the page caching and automatic AI tagging so that I don't have to.

unlogic ,

Linkding which is like pinboard but self hosted. Just because it’s simple. I could do with just using browser sync but hey, I’ve got a server running so I might as well host it

drhoopoe ,

I love linkding, couldn't live without it.

confusedwiseman ,

Ok, I realize this is c/selfhosted, but I have a question… why not use something like the xBrowserSync extension for this?

Aside of someone could associate the data to me for my list of favorite web places, which has 100 other exposure points. Is there another use case you’re solving?

fireshell ,
@fireshell@lemmy.world avatar

Selfhosted RSS reader Miniflux + Wallabag + KOReader client in KPW4 = 👍

Miniflux to get all my feeds which I can analyze manually throughout the day and send selected snippets to Wallabag for later reading either during lunch or at night using KOReader client in KPW4.

ssdfsdf3488sd ,

What is KPW4?

fireshell ,
@fireshell@lemmy.world avatar

Kindle Paperwhite 4

Samsy , (edited )

Linkwarden. Because it has a good design, tags, is selfhostable, has some nice integrations (browser-plugin, PWA) and saves backups of the bookmark in PDF.

daniel31x13 ,

Linkwarden maintainer here, thanks for the shoutout and stay tuned for exciting updates as we have lots of new features lined up for the next release :)

seedoubleyou ,
@seedoubleyou@infosec.pub avatar

I migrated all my Firefox bookmarks to a self-hosted Linkding instance. https://github.com/sissbruecker/linkding/ Lightweight and once you get a tagging methodology in place its super useful.

zabby , (edited )

I've been using Raindrop for about five years. The solo dev really impressed me with his responsiveness to user feedback, so I started paying for premium ($30/yr) even though I don't really need the extra features.

I've used the mobile app, Firefox extension, desktop app (Linux and Windows), and the web app. All have worked flawlessly and have grown more feature rich without ruining the user experience.

The features I use the most are:

  • Endlessly nestable folders that I can give my own icons to make them significantly easier to navigate around
  • Public collections so I can save my favorite GIFs and memes on a public page I can refer back to and share
  • Tagging, descriptions, and notes so I can save a lot of context for each bookmark and why I saved it
  • The built in preview for the mobile app feels buttery smooth, so I seldom open tabs in my mobile browser when I'm visiting my bookmarks
  • The main premium features I actually use are the broken link detector to find links that no longer exist and the permanent copies of those pages

I haven't had a chance to use the REST API, but it appears to be documented quite well.

Overall I've had such a pleasant experience that I've never looked at any other option.

bigredgiraffe , (edited )

+1 for Raindrop, that app is amazing, I keep watching for a self-hosted version/alternative that is as good and they are getting closer. The killer feature for me is being able to highlight stuff and then when you visit the site again you see what you have highlighted (in addition to saving them elsewhere). I also pay for premium because it’s great, I don’t use a ton of the pro features either.

dream_weasel ,

It really is super good

Showroom7561 ,

Floccus is what I use for bookmarks.

Works across pretty much any browser and on Android (maybe iOS, I'm not sure). I've got it set up on my Synology NAS through webdav, and it's been reliable.

I do also use Linkwarden, but that's more to collect web pages, and not just bookmark them. The archive feature is great, since it doesn't rely on the page still being live to work.

Linkwarden and Floccus are very different, IMO.

Blizzard ,
@Blizzard@lemmy.zip avatar

I use the one built in Vivaldi. What's the point of an external bookmark manager?

Samsy ,

They backup them locally. Did you ever searched for something you know existed and it's gone forever?

Blizzard ,
@Blizzard@lemmy.zip avatar

Browsers also keep the bookmarks locally with an option to sync. You can export/import them too if needed. Sorry, still not seeing an added value of an external bookmark manager.

Unless what you're trying to say is that it backs up the websites themselves locally then... that's at least interesting.

AmbiguousProps , (edited )

Does Floccus count? It syncs via caldev into the native bookmarks.

niisyth ,

I've been using Omnivore, with Obsidian plugin to have local copies of the pages.

krash ,

Tell meore about the obsidian plugin, dusbt know of it.

thegreekgeek ,
@thegreekgeek@midwest.social avatar

Basically you can mirror the instapapered versions of your saved pages as markdown files in your obsidian vault. You can customize the whole thing basically so you can put it wherever and have it tie in to your PKM system however you want. I've got mine organized in weekly folders with a dataview block in my daily note showing the articles I've saved that day.

niisyth ,

I'm doing exactly the same 😁😁

thegreekgeek ,
@thegreekgeek@midwest.social avatar

Thats what really kicked me into using obsidian as much as I do.

BlackEco ,
@BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com avatar

I really like Readeck, it is very polished and the fact that it copies links content is very useful when saving Medium blog posts (and generally to make sure that I don't lose the content if the linked page is ever removed)

thatcasualgamingguy ,
@thatcasualgamingguy@lemmy.nerdcore.social avatar

Oh, nice. Saving the link's content is exactly the feature I've been looking for.

MangoPenguin ,
@MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Firefox; easy to sync, easy to access, easy to search through.

poVoq ,
@poVoq@slrpnk.net avatar

I wish they would finally finish that rewrite in Rust so that it can be properly self-hosted again. The old Python2.7 version is a security nightmare.

MangoPenguin ,
@MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I just use their servers, it's encrypted anyways and my bookmarks are all public websites, so other than some data on what I like to bookmark there's not much there.

Strit ,
@Strit@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show avatar

I use the bookmark manager in Firefox, which I can search through.

mbirth ,

Similar here. As I don’t need multi-user support, I don’t bother with self-hosting some tool.

Bookmarks go to Safari where they’re synced between all my Apple devices and pop up automatically in the address bar.

And long-term bookmarks (news articles, references, etc.) go into Anybox which keeps an offline copy of the website so I can still read it in 10-20 years.

tagginator Bot ,

New Lemmy Post: Which link/bookmark manger do you prefer, and why? (https://lemmyverse.link/lemmy.world/post/15904328)
Tagging:

(Replying in the OP of this thread (NOT THIS BOT!) will appear as a comment in the lemmy discussion.)

I am a FOSS bot. Check my README: https://github.com/db0/lemmy-tagginator/blob/main/README.md

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • [email protected]
  • kbinchat
  • All magazines
    •