Is this a Nut? ( sh.itjust.works )

pewgar_seemsimandroid , 3 months ago

wheres scala?

humbletightband , 3 months ago

It's incompatible with the version of this meme

bruhduh , 3 months ago

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/658c93b2-0d5a-4b78-a0d4-882d020e5cee.jpeg
C can STRUCTurise classes tho

winterayars , 3 months ago

Ruby: No, it has been redefined as the number 5 so buckle your seatbelts, kiddos, cuz shit's about to get wild!

RonSijm , 3 months ago

StackOverflow: Question closed as duplicate. Someone else already asked whether or not something is a nut.

_cnt0 , 3 months ago

I just dabbled in javascript again, and that description is spot on!

console.log('javascript operators are b' + 'a' + + 'a' + 'a');

arc , 3 months ago

The only reason people use JS is because it's the defacto language of browsers. As a language it's dogshit filled with all kinds of unpleasant traps.

Here is a fun one I discovered the other day:

new Date('2022-10-9').toUTCString() === 'Sat, 08 Oct 2022 23:00:00 GMT'
new Date('2022-10-09').toUTCString() === 'Sun, 09 Oct 2022 00:00:00 GMT'

So padding a day of the month with a 0 or not changes the result by 1 hour. Every browser does the same so I assume this is a legacy thing. It's supposed to be padded but any sane language would throw an exception if it was malformed. Not JavaScript.

muzzle , 3 months ago

Rust is more like: unless you can mathematically prove to me that this is equivalent to a nut there is no ducking way I'll ever let you compiled this.