Trump Finally Weighs in on Controversial Shark vs. Electrocution Debate ( whowhatwhy.org )

In a soliloquy on batteries for electric vehicles, including ships, he pondered what would happen if such a boat were to sink and the battery would submerge.

...

“It must be because of MIT, my relationship with MIT, very smart, I say, what would happen if the boat sank from its weight, and you have this tremendously powerful battery, and the battery is now underwater and there’s a shark that’s approximately 10 yards over there,” he said as MAGA supporters listened intently. “By the way, a lot of shark attacks lately. Did you notice this? A lot of sha…”

...

“So there is a shark 10 yards from the boat, ten yards… or here,” he said. “Do I get electrocuted if the boat is sinking, water goes over the battery, the boat is sinking? Do I stay on top of the boat and get electrocuted, or do I jump over by the shark and not get electrocuted?”

...

“He didn’t know. He said: ‘Nobody has ever asked me that question.’ I said, ‘I think it’s a good question. I think there is a lot of electric current coming through that water,’” Trump said. “But you know what I would do if there is a shark or you get electrocuted? I’ll take electrocution every single time.* I’m not getting near the shark.”

radix ,
@radix@lemmy.world avatar

That was a very long way to say electric boats are bad because they're preferable to sharks.

DaddleDew ,

For a moment I thought he would have expressed concern about the effects of such a battery on the fragile ecosystem and the endangered species in it. But no, all he did is combine his ignorance about electricity and sharks to formulate this moronic thought.

He mentioned his "relationship with MIT" as well just before spewing out that gem. Was that really him trying to sound smart?

FlyingSquid OP ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

His uncle John Trump was a professor at MIT. Somehow that makes him a genius and gives him a relationship to MIT.

I also have a physicist relative connected to a prestigious institution and I'm a moron.

DaddleDew ,

I mean he inherited everything he owns. He must be thinking that knowledge works the same way.

Twinkletoes ,

This is probably a stupid question but would a battery even electrocute you in the water?

FlyingSquid OP ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

In the ocean? No. In the bathtub? Depends on the battery and what's attached to it when it hits the water, I guess. A car battery with the jumper cables on it thrown into a large enough bathtub to hold it? I wouldn't get in there.

Beryl , (edited )

This guy could suddenly rupture a brain aneurysm and you wouldn't even be able to tell the difference.

Revan343 ,

Of course you'd be able to tell, he'd finally shut up

AllNewTypeFace ,
@AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space avatar

But can you use nuclear weapons against an electric sharknado?

FlyingSquid OP ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

Yes, but they're not always effective. You should really use the ultimate weapon- a sharpie. So powerful it can divert a hurricane!

nezbyte ,

It’s a shame that Mythbusters isn’t around to turn this into a shark week special. I’m pretty sure the myth would be busted and the only risk would be of the batteries catching fire after the shark bites one.

Nougat , (edited )

“But you know what I would do if there is a shark or you get electrocuted? I’ll take electrocution every single time. I’m not getting near the shark.”

Hear me out: Put Trump in a leaky electric boat in shark-infested waters. For science.

Edit: He's still painted black from last time, so it's harder for the sharks to see him.

arandomthought ,

It's surprising, I'd thought he would be team shark. But I'm glad he's finally answering all the important questions.

Cheradenine ,

The Trump version of man or bear

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • kbinchat
  • All magazines