wabafee ,
@wabafee@lemmy.world avatar

Patreon, pay by visit, ads. Personally I just want news sites to be not own by a billionaire.

AnUnusualRelic ,
@AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world avatar

pay by visit

"You can pay 2 € to read this article"

Me: you do realise that's the price of a full, printed, newspaper, right?

spizzat2 ,

And my credit card is going to love the per-transaction fees!

HakFoo ,

If I've learned anything from GTA... just drive the news van around and hit pedestrians until you make budget.

PassingThrough ,

Like a non-profit, with tax breaks and the ability to earn enough to operate, but little more than that or the taxes come back with a vengeance.

Everything needs money to run but when there’s the option to shovel out whatever bait it takes to chase the dragon of uncapped earnings, they’re not in it to keep us informed, just to keep us spending.

BlameThePeacock ,

By taxpayers, at arms length from government control.

The moment there's a profit motive in news, it will skew what gets shown to people and not for their benefit.

BertramDitore ,
@BertramDitore@lemmy.world avatar

This is the only answer I’m okay with. Keeping government away from it would be a challenge, but an easier challenge to handle than our current cesspool of for-profit media companies.

Same with elections, they should be fully funded by taxpayers, and not a single cent of private money should enter the equation. Depending on the office and the size of its constituency, every candidate gets the exact same amount. You accept a dollar from a corp? You’re automatically disqualified. Imagine how much harder candidates would have to work for their votes.

Delphia ,

The problem with that (from a country that has a govt funded channel with news programs) is that if they start being overly critical of a political party when that party gets in they reduce funding.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • kbinchat
  • All magazines