CarbonatedPastaSauce ,

[Thread, post or comment was deleted by the moderator]

    •
    maegul ,
    @maegul@lemmy.ml avatar

    And what would a non-vegan want to do in there?

    What's wrong with minority views and practices creating their own spaces?

    On which, is there any non-vegan/anti-vegan thought or idea that a vegan is likely to have not heard already? How many haven't they heard relative to the amount of decent "pro-vegan" ideas they also haven't heard of?

    Maybe a specialised space, echo chamber even, makes sense in order to balance against the gravity of the mainstream?

    CarbonatedPastaSauce ,

    [Thread, post or comment was deleted by the moderator]

    •
    maegul ,
    @maegul@lemmy.ml avatar

    Right. Well, I think the instance name "vegantheory.org" was doing that already, and I'm betting you drew your conclusion from the public description of the place too (and aren't in the modlog or anything for challenging their ideas).

    CarbonatedPastaSauce ,

    [Thread, post or comment was deleted by the moderator]

    •
    maegul ,
    @maegul@lemmy.ml avatar

    they drive away potential allies because the concept of harm reduction is anathema to their binary thinking. If you’re not ALL in, you’re the enemy.

    I can resonate with that. But I come back to ... "it's totally ok for people to create their own spaces, especially on federated social media and especially for minority groups/ideas".

    There are likely plenty of other spaces for "potential allies" to engage and talk about veganism if they want to, or plenty they, or you, could make on their own.

    Tacitly admitting that vegans are usually antisocial zealots. “It’s right in the name!”

    Well, they're running their own social media platform, so I'm not sure how anti-social they are.

    CarbonatedPastaSauce ,

    Agreed for the most part. But you can absolutely be antisocial to your ‘other’ or ‘out group’.

    Future ,

    Veganism tends to be a religion for a lot of vegans and they drive away potential allies because the concept of harm reduction is anathema to their binary thinking. If you’re not ALL in, you’re the enemy.

    That is a strawman and a lie as vegans are always celebrating the small wins for the increased protections on animal rights.

    CarbonatedPastaSauce ,

    I’ve experienced it first hand. I am not a liar.

    maegul ,
    @maegul@lemmy.ml avatar

    I believe you ... gate-keeping types are all over the place really.

    But vegans or the "vegan-curious" aren't one thing or one kind of person, at least not any more. I personally have only ever had positive conversations with vegan types.

    This instance, in being insistent on not entertaining any "harm reduction" or "compromises", makes sense though ... because it's a space for people to talk about that sort of dedicated approach.

    Maggoty Mod ,

    This is not the place to take a run at vegans. It's not the place to take a run at anyone announcing their community.

    Blaze ,
    @Blaze@reddthat.com avatar

    Thanks!

    andrew_s , (edited )
    @andrew_s@piefed.social avatar

    Your instance rejects Follow requests from instances not on your 'Allow list', which is a pretty small list.

    Edit: the list has since been expanded.

    Beaver OP ,
    @Beaver@lemmy.ca avatar

    Sorry about that. We will try to fix the issue.

    DerisionConsulting ,

    you missed the "!", so browsers parse that as an email address

    Beaver OP ,
    @Beaver@lemmy.ca avatar

    Thank you for the correction.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • [email protected]
  • kbinchat
  • All magazines
    •