Congrats. Tesseract has always been very impressive.
This post suggests there's a problem with Lemmy/PeerTube federation, but it'll be good to see the videos embedded (even if they have to be brought through manually)
Interesting about the broken Peertube federation. I'm following a few channels (mostly for testing purposes) and I did get new posts to them from PT's side and saw my votes reflected on each end. Haven't gone back and done any comparison's lately, though. That post says it hasn't worked in ~3 months. If it's a Lemmy issue, It's possible that it works for me since my instance is still on 0.18.5? If something changed with Peertube, then I may have just not noticed. Will check on that when I have some time as I'm now curious.
Update: Seems the ones I got were just from the initial fetch.
Update #2: A new PT video came through this morning on one of the channels I follow. So maybe federation does work but is just wonky/inconsistent? Again, I'm still on 0.18.5 so may have something to do with it.
Regardless, yeah, like you said, they'll still embed when brought over manually.
It fetches x amount of post (sorted by new, top, hot or rising, user choice) from a user specified subreddit, and from all of these results it takes one post at random and shows it to the user. So it's random, kind of.. it probably could use better wording for sure
Hello! I just included "Cross post" as a filter on the website. To show apps that support Cross-Posting or Mod log (tools), deselect the other filters under the "Features" column.
I am planning a front-end rewrite in React or another UI framework to be more reactive and modern. If you have any suggestions, I am all ears. Thank you!
I really want Lemmy to be good to use and have good content.
Thanks for you comment, and I totally agree, especially for Mysteries community, I wish we had some on here, some ARG communitys etc.. not clone of reddit posts for these, because you wouldn't be able to be part of it truly, I just wish those community would come over on Lemmy.
not clone of reddit posts for these, because you wouldn’t be able to be part of it truly, I just wish those community would come over on Lemmy.
It's a little bit of a Catch-22 though. They're not going to come over unless the content they're used to is already here. That's why you need the cloning.
And just wishing for it ain't going to be enough. Once the content is cloned here on Lemmy, Lemmy users can run with it from there, and they can actually contribute to the cloned content on the Lemmy side, so it's still a win-win.
Yes that's true, every Fediverse platform is a more or less the same, poeple don't want to come because there's not enough content, so there is not enough content, and the cycle repeat itself...
Wishing won't ever help that's true, but I'm doing my part in the best way I can! I believe there are already bots that can replicate reddit posts and answer, I've seen one of these around, I don't remember which one tho...
Wishing won’t ever help that’s true, but I’m doing my part in the best way I can!
You're doing good, TY for contributing.
FYI, while I am responding to you directly, I'm also 'Speaking to the Choir' as in may, as there's usually a negative pushback to cloning Reddit content onto Lemmy.
I always just assume it's Reddit bots trying not to lose the only advantage they have, the content they already hold/contain.
But it also could just be Lemmy users who only want a 'pure' experience, and 'larger population / market share' and success be damned.
there's usually a negative pushback to cloning Reddit content onto Lemmy.
Bots have their utility, but should be treated with caution, as they have the risk of flooding small communities with posts which garner zero comments. It might be a good idea to aim for no more than 50% of posts (on average) being from bots.
@Krafting, would there be a way to incorporate some form of rate-limiting based on the level of human activity in the community?
Also, rate limiting should be implemented at the lemmy server level (if someone wanted to flood/spam a community he could write a simple script that post 1000 post per seconds easily)
Plus there are already real bot software that repost reddit content without human approbation, this app doesn't repost automatically without the user input.
But I totally understand this concern. And I'll see if this app gets abused or anything that might deteriorate our Lemmy experience.
It is possible, but I don't think I'll do that, because I also use this app on my main account for stuff that I find funny, cool, beautiful and more. And if it gets comment I'll answer them and keep the community aspect of everything. At the end of the day, this comes down to what the use wants to do with the app.
However, I could add a disclaimer that if the user only post with this app and nothing else, its account should be marked as bot, but I do not want to make that mandatory.
We'll see in the future if the app gets used and how it might affect content here!
Please consider this post to be a work-in-progress. It took me a little longer to assemble than I originally thought, because I really wanted it to be as complete as possible to begin with. I've included some additional links for folks to quickly find or learn about these apps, as well as reach out to the creators with kudos. I hope to solve some of the issues that existed with previous directories. Among these are a few open questions for the community:
This list is sorted by latest release to include more current information at the top. Is there a wiser way to communicate this?
Should out-of-date apps be removed? There are some apps that are officially discontinued but still very usable, such as tesseract. There are apps that have not had an update in over 6 months but are still popular, such as Liftoff! What makes sense as a criteria for inclusion?
I excluded apps that were announced but never released, such as Warami. Is there a place in this list for those?
Are there any devs who do not wish to be tagged in this list? Just let me know (preferably by DM).
How do we feel about including donation links in this list? On the one hand, I think it's good to help people easily support those making the tools. I did not include them in the first draft because ultimately, I think that should be the responsibility of the devs and the individual app communities to decide how they promote.
FOSS apps are marked with a open symbol. This seemed to be an elegant way to distinguish them without disrupting the list too much. Please double check that I correctly labeled the apps on this list!
I did not test the formatting on every app. I know that there are some that do not yet have correct implementation of spoilers, etc. I am not sure how to keep the list usable without some way to collapse parts (possibly remove apps?). Would it be better to use simpler formatting at the expense of ease of use? Let me know your thoughts.
If you see any missing or incorrect information, please comment or message me and I will correct it within a day (usually much faster).
Finally, I did not include Lemmy tools/extensions/scripts on this list, since it quickly becomes a rabbit hole if there is any desire for completeness. I will probably start a separate discussion thread for those.
This list belongs to all of us, so please share your thoughts on how to improve it!
Having a separate list for extensions would work nicely, although I think it fits to have the extensions listed here. There are few actual browser extensions for Lemmy/Kbin/Mastodon. There are a lot of scripts, and we were working on incorporating the better scripts into the extension for the same reasons you mentioned above. Scripts are harder to manage and review
My thoughts on the questions.
"last stable version" sounds like a good way to sort it, for readers. It might become cumbersome for you to manage unless you can automate it somehow.
I'm leaning towards flagging or removing out of date apps because of potential security issues. Could you contact devs after a few months to ask if it is being maintained?
A big list of every app would be interesting for data. It isn't helpful for users, so I agree with keeping them off
I have a donation link. I don't think it should be included in guides or lists either
I like the formatting, as a reader. Consider if it becomes too cumbersome for you and your team to manage. I'd rather have a list that stays up to date and doesn't cause headaches for the maintainer
My theory is that if we start with an up-to-date list, we can crowdsource updates without too much trouble. In theory?
I'm letting this settle for a couple days before tackling the discussion of what tools to include. I'd love to hear your thoughts about inclusion criteria! Feel free to reply or DM me.
Maybe we could have a "nominate for removal" process to deal with out of date apps. Some are obvious, but some are less so. Not every app will have a release every 6 months.
My theory is that if we start with an up-to-date list, we can crowdsource updates without too much trouble. In theory?
One way to do this could be to have a GitHub repo where the list is hosted. That way if someone wants to update it, they create a pull request that can be accepted by the moderating team
Mlem has this feature planned--we have a clear path towards implementation, but there's a lot of groundwork and design to do first so it probably won't be delivered for at least several months.
Lemmy Apps
Active
This magazine is not receiving updates (last activity 1 day(s) ago).